CAJ | 학술논문

目的：对比研究超声造影与彩色多普勒超声诊断异位妊娠的临床效果。方法回顾性分析2011年8月～2013年2月我院收治的100例异位妊娠患者的临床资料。结果100例中，手术病理证实为异位妊娠的88例，经腹腔镜及刮宫病理证实宫内孕12例。超声造影诊断异位妊娠的敏感性为98．2％，特异性为80．0％，准确性为96．0％；彩色多普勒超声诊断异位妊娠的敏感性为86．2％，特异性为53．3％，准确性为81．4％，超声造影诊断异位妊娠的敏感性、特异性、准确性均明显比彩色多普勒超声高（ P＜0．05）。结论超声造影比彩色多普勒超声诊断异位妊娠具有较好的临床效果，值得推广。
목적：대비연구초성조영여채색다보륵초성진단이위임신적림상효과。방법회고성분석2011년8월～2013년2월아원수치적100례이위임신환자적림상자료。결과100례중，수술병리증실위이위임신적88례，경복강경급괄궁병리증실궁내잉12례。초성조영진단이위임신적민감성위98．2％，특이성위80．0％，준학성위96．0％；채색다보륵초성진단이위임신적민감성위86．2％，특이성위53．3％，준학성위81．4％，초성조영진단이위임신적민감성、특이성、준학성균명현비채색다보륵초성고（ P＜0．05）。결론초성조영비채색다보륵초성진단이위임신구유교호적림상효과，치득추엄。
Objective To compare the clinical effects of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and color Doppler ultrasound on the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy .Methods A retrospective analysis was made to the clinical data of 100 cases with ectopic pregnancy hospitalized from August,2011 to February,2013.Results Out of the 100 cases,88 cases were confirmed by postoperative pathological study to have ectopic pregnancy and 12 cases were confirmed by pathological study after endoscopic surgery and dilatation and curettage to have intrauterine pregnancy .In diagnosing ectopic pregnancy ,contrast-enhanced ultrasound had a sensitivity of 98.2%,a specificity of 80.0%and an accuracy of 96.0%,while color Doppler ultrasound had a sensitivity of 86.2%,a specificity of 53.3% and an accuracy of 81.4%;the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound were much higher than those of color Doppler ultrasound ( P <0.05).Conclusions Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is of better clinical effects in diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy than color Doppler ultrasound and is worthy of wide application .