检验检疫学刊
檢驗檢疫學刊
검험검역학간
INSPECTION AND QUARANTINE SCIENCE
2014年
1期
55-57
,共3页
王林%杨金宝%张顺合%李西标%李金有%慈颖%孙薇%楚翔%陈春田%郭文静
王林%楊金寶%張順閤%李西標%李金有%慈穎%孫薇%楚翔%陳春田%郭文靜
왕림%양금보%장순합%리서표%리금유%자영%손미%초상%진춘전%곽문정
硫酰氟%尿氟%尿肌酐%熏蒸
硫酰氟%尿氟%尿肌酐%熏蒸
류선불%뇨불%뇨기항%훈증
Sulfuryl Fluoride%Urinary Fluoride%Creatinine%Fumigation
[目的]检测硫酰氟熏蒸处理作业人员尿氟浓度，探讨现有防护模式的防护效果。[方法]以硫酰氟熏蒸处理作业人员为实验对象，非一线作业人员为对照。收集晨尿，用氟离子选择电极法检测尿氟浓度，用苦味酸比色法测定尿肌酐含量，用肌酐校正尿氟浓度，获得研究对象的尿氟水平。[结果]78名硫酰氟熏蒸处理作业人员与58名非一线作业人员尿氟浓度均值为1.060 mg/L和0.599 mg/L，经t检验，t=3.896， p＜0.05，差异有显著意义。[结论]从尿氟浓度来看，硫酰氟熏蒸处理作业人员的尿氟水平高于对照组，说明现有硫酰氟熏蒸防护措施尚不完善，需要进一步研究安全的防护措施。
[目的]檢測硫酰氟熏蒸處理作業人員尿氟濃度，探討現有防護模式的防護效果。[方法]以硫酰氟熏蒸處理作業人員為實驗對象，非一線作業人員為對照。收集晨尿，用氟離子選擇電極法檢測尿氟濃度，用苦味痠比色法測定尿肌酐含量，用肌酐校正尿氟濃度，穫得研究對象的尿氟水平。[結果]78名硫酰氟熏蒸處理作業人員與58名非一線作業人員尿氟濃度均值為1.060 mg/L和0.599 mg/L，經t檢驗，t=3.896， p＜0.05，差異有顯著意義。[結論]從尿氟濃度來看，硫酰氟熏蒸處理作業人員的尿氟水平高于對照組，說明現有硫酰氟熏蒸防護措施尚不完善，需要進一步研究安全的防護措施。
[목적]검측류선불훈증처리작업인원뇨불농도，탐토현유방호모식적방호효과。[방법]이류선불훈증처리작업인원위실험대상，비일선작업인원위대조。수집신뇨，용불리자선택전겁법검측뇨불농도，용고미산비색법측정뇨기항함량，용기항교정뇨불농도，획득연구대상적뇨불수평。[결과]78명류선불훈증처리작업인원여58명비일선작업인원뇨불농도균치위1.060 mg/L화0.599 mg/L，경t검험，t=3.896， p＜0.05，차이유현저의의。[결론]종뇨불농도래간，류선불훈증처리작업인원적뇨불수평고우대조조，설명현유류선불훈증방호조시상불완선，수요진일보연구안전적방호조시。
In order to explore the protective effect of existing protection mode, the level of urinary fluoride was determined in Sulfuryl fluoride fumigation workers at port. The sulfuryl fluoride fumigation workers served as subject group, office workers as control group, their urinary fluoride and creatinine were tested by fluorine ion selective electrode method and Picric acid colorimetric method repectively. The study detected the urinary fluoride and creatinine of 78 people in subject group and 58 office workers in control group. The ratio of urinary fluoride and creatinine in two group was 0.083 and 0.093 respectively, and the difference was significant (t=3.625, p<0.05). Concerning that urinary fluoride for sulfuryl fluoride fumigation workers was higher than that for the control group, the existing sulfuryl fluoride fumigation protective measures might be insafe.
