医学美学美容（中旬刊）
醫學美學美容（中旬刊）
의학미학미용（중순간）
MEDICAL AESTHETICS AND COSMETOLOGY
2014年
3期
32-33
,共2页
牙周翻瓣术%二次牙周基础治疗术%重度成人慢性牙周炎
牙週翻瓣術%二次牙週基礎治療術%重度成人慢性牙週炎
아주번판술%이차아주기출치료술%중도성인만성아주염
periodontal double disc surgery%Secondary periodontal healing%Severe adult chronic periodontitis
目的：比较牙周翻瓣术与二次牙周基础治疗术在重度成人慢性牙周炎中临床治疗中的应用价值。方法选取2008至2012年我院收治的重度成人慢性牙周炎患者94例,随机平均分配为观察组和对照组,对照组患者采用牙周翻瓣术进行治疗,观察组患者采用二次牙周基础治疗术进行治疗,比较两组患者治疗前后的菌斑指数(PLI)、探诊出血(BOP),龈沟出血指数(SBI),牙周探诊深度(PD),使用SPSS 13.0软件包进行统计学分析。结果两组治疗前及治疗后6个月患者的PLI、BOP, SBI及PD值均无显著性差异,P>0.05。结论：长期看牙周翻瓣术和二次牙周基础治疗术均是重度成人慢性牙周炎的有效的临床治疗手段,且二次牙周基础治疗术是一种非手术治疗,操作较为简便、疗效显著,更加适宜于基层临床推广应用。
目的：比較牙週翻瓣術與二次牙週基礎治療術在重度成人慢性牙週炎中臨床治療中的應用價值。方法選取2008至2012年我院收治的重度成人慢性牙週炎患者94例,隨機平均分配為觀察組和對照組,對照組患者採用牙週翻瓣術進行治療,觀察組患者採用二次牙週基礎治療術進行治療,比較兩組患者治療前後的菌斑指數(PLI)、探診齣血(BOP),齦溝齣血指數(SBI),牙週探診深度(PD),使用SPSS 13.0軟件包進行統計學分析。結果兩組治療前及治療後6箇月患者的PLI、BOP, SBI及PD值均無顯著性差異,P>0.05。結論：長期看牙週翻瓣術和二次牙週基礎治療術均是重度成人慢性牙週炎的有效的臨床治療手段,且二次牙週基礎治療術是一種非手術治療,操作較為簡便、療效顯著,更加適宜于基層臨床推廣應用。
목적：비교아주번판술여이차아주기출치료술재중도성인만성아주염중림상치료중적응용개치。방법선취2008지2012년아원수치적중도성인만성아주염환자94례,수궤평균분배위관찰조화대조조,대조조환자채용아주번판술진행치료,관찰조환자채용이차아주기출치료술진행치료,비교량조환자치료전후적균반지수(PLI)、탐진출혈(BOP),간구출혈지수(SBI),아주탐진심도(PD),사용SPSS 13.0연건포진행통계학분석。결과량조치료전급치료후6개월환자적PLI、BOP, SBI급PD치균무현저성차이,P>0.05。결론：장기간아주번판술화이차아주기출치료술균시중도성인만성아주염적유효적림상치료수단,차이차아주기출치료술시일충비수술치료,조작교위간편、료효현저,경가괄의우기층림상추엄응용。
objective to compare periodontal double disc surgery and secondary periodontal healing technique in severe clinical application value of adult chronic periodontitis. Method, from 2008 to 2012 to our hospital, 94patients with severe adult chronic periodontitis, randomly split as observation group and control group, control group were treated by periodontal flap surgery treatment, observation group were treated by secondary periodontal healing treatment, compared two groups of patients before and after treatment of probe hemorrhage ( BOP) , plaque index ( PLI) , periodontal probing depth ( PD) , gingival sulcus bleeding index (SBI), using SPSS 13. 0 software package for statistical analysis. Results two groups of patients before and after the treatment of PLI, BOP, SBI and PD value had no significant difference, P > 0. 05;Two groups of patients with alveolar bone resorption, there was no significant difference (P > 0. 05). Conclusion periodontal double disc and secondary periodontal therapies can be effective for severe clinical treatment of adult chronic periodontitis, and secondary periodontal basic treatment operation is simple, efficacy significantly, more suitable for clinical application.
