CAJ | 학술논문

目的生物化学课程是医学类学生的专业基础课,课程难度大,传统课堂教学存在许多不足,需要探索新的教学方法以提高教学质量和学习效率.方法选择成人医学教育6个自然班的301名学生为研究对象,分为实验组(150人)和对照组(151人).对照组接受传统教学,实验组运用“双轨制教学”,如示意图法、肢体语言法、“幽默语言”教学等,以激发学生的科研创新兴趣.课程结束后,让学生进行网上评教并组织教师之间进行互评.采用试卷分析软件分析考试试卷,考试成绩采用SPSS 15.0统计软件进行数据处理,成绩以均数±标准差(i±s)表示,各组之间比较进行t检验,以P＜0.05为差异有统计学意义.结果学生评价与教师评教结果均显示,有93.7％的学生和90.9％的教师认为实验组采用的双轨制教学方法比对照组的教学更受欢迎.教学结束后对照组、实验组学生成绩分别为(66±25)分和(83±22)分,t值为6.261,P值为0.000.结论 “双轨制教学”与传统教学相比具有明显的优势.“双轨制教学”能够让学生快乐地动脑、动口,更主动参与、积极探究,明显激发了其学习兴趣,提高了考试成绩,取得良好的教学效果.
목적 생물화학과정시의학류학생적전업기출과,과정난도대,전통과당교학존재허다불족,수요탐색신적교학방법이제고교학질량화학습효솔.방법 선택성인의학교육6개자연반적301명학생위연구대상,분위실험조(150인)화대조조(151인).대조조접수전통교학,실험조운용“쌍궤제교학”,여시의도법、지체어언법、“유묵어언”교학등,이격발학생적과연창신흥취.과정결속후,양학생진행망상평교병조직교사지간진행호평.채용시권분석연건분석고시시권,고시성적채용SPSS 15.0통계연건진행수거처리,성적이균수±표준차(i±s)표시,각조지간비교진행t검험,이P＜0.05위차이유통계학의의.결과 학생평개여교사평교결과균현시,유93.7％적학생화90.9％적교사인위실험조채용적쌍궤제교학방법비대조조적교학경수환영.교학결속후대조조、실험조학생성적분별위(66±25)분화(83±22)분,t치위6.261,P치위0.000.결론 “쌍궤제교학”여전통교학상비구유명현적우세.“쌍궤제교학”능구양학생쾌악지동뇌、동구,경주동삼여、적겁탐구,명현격발료기학습흥취,제고료고시성적,취득량호적교학효과.
Objective Biochemistry course,a professional basic course of medical students,is a challenging course,for which the traditional classroom teaching mode is not suitable,for there are many deficiencies in traditional classroom teaching,so new teaching methods need to be explored to improve the quality of teaching and learning efficiency.Method 301 students from 6 natural classes of adult medical education were selected as the object of study and were divided into the experimental group(150) and control group(151).The traditional teaching mode was adopted in the control group,while in the experimental group,the "double-track" teaching methods were adopted such as diagram method,the method of using body language,"humor" teaching method,to stimulate students' interest in scientific research and innovation.At the end of the course,students were asked to conduct online teaching evaluation while teachers were asked to conduct mutual evaluation.Examination paper analysis software was used to evaluate the examination paper.Test results were analyzed by using SPSS 15 Statistical Software for data processing.Results:mean ± standard deviation (~ ± s) ; comparison was made between groups in t test.The difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05).Result The evaluation results of students and colleagues assessment show that 93.7％ of the students and 90.9％ of colleagues think that the experimental group uses the double-track teaching method is more popular than in the control group.At the end of the experiment,the control group grades is (66 ± 25),while the experimental group grades is (83 ± 22) ; t value is 6.2612; P value is 0.000.Conclusion Compared with traditional teaching method double-track teaching method has obvious advantages in teaching.From the result,"double-track teaching" enables students willing to think and have an active participation and exploration,which has significantly stimulated their learning interest and improved their performance,thus achieving good results.