实用医学杂志
實用醫學雜誌
실용의학잡지
THE JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL MEDICINE
2014年
7期
1161-1163
,共3页
赵晶%娄培安%陈培培%张盼%乔程%李婷
趙晶%婁培安%陳培培%張盼%喬程%李婷
조정%루배안%진배배%장반%교정%리정
糖尿病,2型%睡眠质量%生存质量
糖尿病,2型%睡眠質量%生存質量
당뇨병,2형%수면질량%생존질량
Diabetes mellitus,type 2%Sleep quality%Quality of life
目的:探讨睡眠质量对2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者生存质量的影响。方法:采用多阶段整群随机抽样方法,对徐州市944例T2DM患者,使用自行设计的问卷、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数量表(PSQI)、生存质量特异性量表(DSQL)和抑郁自评量表(SDS)进行面对面调查。结果:T2DM 患者中睡眠质量较差的比例达33.6%。每晚睡眠时间<6 h组患者的生理、心理、社会关系和生存质量总分均高于6~8 h组(P<0.01)。睡眠质量良好、一般和较差组的生存质量总分分别为(44.77±9.61)、(50.11±11.08)和(56.95±14.57)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。校正了年龄、性别、并发症、病程、抑郁等因素后,睡眠质量与生存质量的相关系数为3.92。其中,睡眠质量与生理维度的相关系数最大(r=0.407,P<0.01)。结论:良好的睡眠质量可能有助于提高T2DM患者的生存质量,尤其对生理维度具有积极作用。
目的:探討睡眠質量對2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者生存質量的影響。方法:採用多階段整群隨機抽樣方法,對徐州市944例T2DM患者,使用自行設計的問捲、匹玆堡睡眠質量指數量錶(PSQI)、生存質量特異性量錶(DSQL)和抑鬱自評量錶(SDS)進行麵對麵調查。結果:T2DM 患者中睡眠質量較差的比例達33.6%。每晚睡眠時間<6 h組患者的生理、心理、社會關繫和生存質量總分均高于6~8 h組(P<0.01)。睡眠質量良好、一般和較差組的生存質量總分分彆為(44.77±9.61)、(50.11±11.08)和(56.95±14.57)分,差異有統計學意義(P<0.01)。校正瞭年齡、性彆、併髮癥、病程、抑鬱等因素後,睡眠質量與生存質量的相關繫數為3.92。其中,睡眠質量與生理維度的相關繫數最大(r=0.407,P<0.01)。結論:良好的睡眠質量可能有助于提高T2DM患者的生存質量,尤其對生理維度具有積極作用。
목적:탐토수면질량대2형당뇨병(T2DM)환자생존질량적영향。방법:채용다계단정군수궤추양방법,대서주시944례T2DM환자,사용자행설계적문권、필자보수면질량지수량표(PSQI)、생존질량특이성량표(DSQL)화억욱자평량표(SDS)진행면대면조사。결과:T2DM 환자중수면질량교차적비례체33.6%。매만수면시간<6 h조환자적생리、심리、사회관계화생존질량총분균고우6~8 h조(P<0.01)。수면질량량호、일반화교차조적생존질량총분분별위(44.77±9.61)、(50.11±11.08)화(56.95±14.57)분,차이유통계학의의(P<0.01)。교정료년령、성별、병발증、병정、억욱등인소후,수면질량여생존질량적상관계수위3.92。기중,수면질량여생리유도적상관계수최대(r=0.407,P<0.01)。결론:량호적수면질량가능유조우제고T2DM환자적생존질량,우기대생리유도구유적겁작용。
Objective To explore the relationship between sleep quality and quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods Multi-stage randomized cluster sampling was used in the survey and self-designed questionaire , Pittsburgh sleep quality index scale , diabetes specific quality of life scale and self-rating depression scale were adopted. Results The poor sleep quality rate was 33.6%. Compared with the group with 6~8 h sleep duration, the scores of physical function,psychological dimension,social relations and quality of life were higher in patients with < 6 h sleep duration (P < 0.01).The average quality of life score was significantly higher among the sleep disorder participants than the other groups(56.95 ± 14.57 vs 50.11 ± 11.08 vs 44.77 ± 9.61,P<0.01). After adjusting for age, gender, complications, course of disease and depression, etc. The correlation coefficient of sleep quality and quality of life was 3.92. Among them , the sleep quality and physical dimensions of the correlation coefficient is the largest(r=0.407,P<0.01). Conclusions It can be an effective method of improving their status of life quality by ameliorating their sleep quality , especially for the physical dimension.