中国脊柱脊髓杂志
中國脊柱脊髓雜誌
중국척주척수잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF SPINE AND SPINAL CORD
2014年
2期
138-143
,共6页
姚珍松%叶林强%江晓兵%梁德%唐永超%佘坤源%张顺聪%晋大祥
姚珍鬆%葉林彊%江曉兵%樑德%唐永超%佘坤源%張順聰%晉大祥
요진송%협림강%강효병%량덕%당영초%사곤원%장순총%진대상
经皮椎体成形术%椎体压缩骨折%中上胸椎%骨质疏松%椎弓根入路%椎弓根外侧入路
經皮椎體成形術%椎體壓縮骨摺%中上胸椎%骨質疏鬆%椎弓根入路%椎弓根外側入路
경피추체성형술%추체압축골절%중상흉추%골질소송%추궁근입로%추궁근외측입로
Percutaneous vertebroplasty%Vertebral compression fracture%Middle and upper thoracic%Osteo-porosis%Transpediclar approach%Extrapedicular approach
目的:探讨经皮椎体成形术(percutaneous vertebroplasty,PVP)治疗中上段胸椎(T6以上胸椎)骨质疏松性重度椎体压缩骨折(severe vertebral compression fractures,SVCF)的临床效果。方法:回顾性分析2011年1月~2012年12月我院采用PVP治疗的12例中上段胸椎骨质疏松性SVCF患者,男4例,女8例;年龄61~83岁,平均74.5岁。骨折节段:T21例,T33例,T53例,T65例。受累节段椎体前缘平均压缩为68%(65%~72%)。腰椎骨密度T值为-3.8~-5.2,平均-4.2。术前胸背痛VAS评分为6.75±1.14分,ODI为(68.58±5.70)%,受累节段椎体前缘高度为0.96±0.09cm,受累节段椎体后凸角为18.90°±1.03°。均行PVP,其中10例采用椎弓根入路,2例采用椎弓根外侧入路,所有患者均采取双侧穿刺置管。结果:所有患者均顺利完成手术,10例经椎弓根入路的手术时间为27~51min,平均41min;2例经椎弓根外侧入路的平均手术时间为62min。术中出血量为5~16ml,平均10ml。骨水泥注入量为1.7~2.8ml,平均为2.2ml。1例术前CT显示上终板裂口的患者术后发现椎间隙骨水泥渗漏,但无不适症状,未行特殊处理。术后2d,胸背痛VAS评分为3.17±1.03分,ODI为(33.00±17.54)%,均较术前明显改善(P<0.05);受累节段椎体前缘高度为0.98±0.11cm,受累节段椎体后凸角为19.10°±0.99°,与术前比较无明显改善(P>0.05)。随访6个月~1年,手术椎体未再发生骨折及塌陷,未发现相邻节段骨折。末次随访时,胸背痛VAS评分为3.75±0.85分,ODI为(32.33±17.11)%,受累节段椎体前缘高度为0.97±0.12cm,受累节段椎体后凸角为19.08°±1.00°,与术后2d比较均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论:PVP治疗中上段胸椎骨质疏松性SVCF可以有效缓解胸背痛,但受累节段椎体前缘高度及后凸角恢复不显著。
目的:探討經皮椎體成形術(percutaneous vertebroplasty,PVP)治療中上段胸椎(T6以上胸椎)骨質疏鬆性重度椎體壓縮骨摺(severe vertebral compression fractures,SVCF)的臨床效果。方法:迴顧性分析2011年1月~2012年12月我院採用PVP治療的12例中上段胸椎骨質疏鬆性SVCF患者,男4例,女8例;年齡61~83歲,平均74.5歲。骨摺節段:T21例,T33例,T53例,T65例。受纍節段椎體前緣平均壓縮為68%(65%~72%)。腰椎骨密度T值為-3.8~-5.2,平均-4.2。術前胸揹痛VAS評分為6.75±1.14分,ODI為(68.58±5.70)%,受纍節段椎體前緣高度為0.96±0.09cm,受纍節段椎體後凸角為18.90°±1.03°。均行PVP,其中10例採用椎弓根入路,2例採用椎弓根外側入路,所有患者均採取雙側穿刺置管。結果:所有患者均順利完成手術,10例經椎弓根入路的手術時間為27~51min,平均41min;2例經椎弓根外側入路的平均手術時間為62min。術中齣血量為5~16ml,平均10ml。骨水泥註入量為1.7~2.8ml,平均為2.2ml。1例術前CT顯示上終闆裂口的患者術後髮現椎間隙骨水泥滲漏,但無不適癥狀,未行特殊處理。術後2d,胸揹痛VAS評分為3.17±1.03分,ODI為(33.00±17.54)%,均較術前明顯改善(P<0.05);受纍節段椎體前緣高度為0.98±0.11cm,受纍節段椎體後凸角為19.10°±0.99°,與術前比較無明顯改善(P>0.05)。隨訪6箇月~1年,手術椎體未再髮生骨摺及塌陷,未髮現相鄰節段骨摺。末次隨訪時,胸揹痛VAS評分為3.75±0.85分,ODI為(32.33±17.11)%,受纍節段椎體前緣高度為0.97±0.12cm,受纍節段椎體後凸角為19.08°±1.00°,與術後2d比較均無統計學差異(P>0.05)。結論:PVP治療中上段胸椎骨質疏鬆性SVCF可以有效緩解胸揹痛,但受纍節段椎體前緣高度及後凸角恢複不顯著。
목적:탐토경피추체성형술(percutaneous vertebroplasty,PVP)치료중상단흉추(T6이상흉추)골질소송성중도추체압축골절(severe vertebral compression fractures,SVCF)적림상효과。방법:회고성분석2011년1월~2012년12월아원채용PVP치료적12례중상단흉추골질소송성SVCF환자,남4례,녀8례;년령61~83세,평균74.5세。골절절단:T21례,T33례,T53례,T65례。수루절단추체전연평균압축위68%(65%~72%)。요추골밀도T치위-3.8~-5.2,평균-4.2。술전흉배통VAS평분위6.75±1.14분,ODI위(68.58±5.70)%,수루절단추체전연고도위0.96±0.09cm,수루절단추체후철각위18.90°±1.03°。균행PVP,기중10례채용추궁근입로,2례채용추궁근외측입로,소유환자균채취쌍측천자치관。결과:소유환자균순리완성수술,10례경추궁근입로적수술시간위27~51min,평균41min;2례경추궁근외측입로적평균수술시간위62min。술중출혈량위5~16ml,평균10ml。골수니주입량위1.7~2.8ml,평균위2.2ml。1례술전CT현시상종판렬구적환자술후발현추간극골수니삼루,단무불괄증상,미행특수처리。술후2d,흉배통VAS평분위3.17±1.03분,ODI위(33.00±17.54)%,균교술전명현개선(P<0.05);수루절단추체전연고도위0.98±0.11cm,수루절단추체후철각위19.10°±0.99°,여술전비교무명현개선(P>0.05)。수방6개월~1년,수술추체미재발생골절급탑함,미발현상린절단골절。말차수방시,흉배통VAS평분위3.75±0.85분,ODI위(32.33±17.11)%,수루절단추체전연고도위0.97±0.12cm,수루절단추체후철각위19.08°±1.00°,여술후2d비교균무통계학차이(P>0.05)。결론:PVP치료중상단흉추골질소송성SVCF가이유효완해흉배통,단수루절단추체전연고도급후철각회복불현저。
Objectives: To investigate the clinical outcome of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for middle and upper thoracic(above T6) osteoporotic severe vertebral compression fracture(SVCF). Methods: 12 patients with painful middle and upper thoracic osteoporotic SVCF treated by PVP between January 2011 and Decem-ber 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. The patients included 4 males and 8 females, with a mean age of 74.5 years(61-83 years). A total of 12 vertebrae was involved in this group including T2 in 1, T3 in 3, T5 in 3 as well as T6 in 5. The mean rate of loss of vertebral height was 68%(65%-72%). The mean T value of lumbar BMD was -4.2[(-3.8)-(-5.2)]. Before operation, VAS score of back pain was 6.75 ±1.14, ODI was (68.58±5.70)%, anterior height(AH) of the compressive vertebral body was 0.96±0.09cm, kyphosis angle(KA) of the compressive vertebral body was 18.90°±1.03°. Bilateral transpedicular approach was used in 10 cases and bilateral extrapedicular approach in 2 cases. Results: Surgery was performed successfully on all the patients. The mean surgical time was 41min (27-51min) for 10 cases undergoing bilateral transpedicular approach and 62 minutes for 2 cases undergoing bilateral extrapedicular approach. The mean blood loss was 10ml(5-16ml). The average volume of instilling polymethylmethacrylate(PMMA) was 2.2(1.7-2.8)ml. Disc leakage of PMMA through the superior endplate incompetence was noted in one case, which was asymptomatic and free of in-tervention. Two days after operation, VAS of back pain was 3.17 ±1.03, ODI was (33.00 ±17.54)%, which all showed significant differences; AH was 0.98±0.11cm, KA was 19.10°±0.99°, which showed no improvement(P>0.05). New fracture either in diseased level or adjacent level could not be found during the follow-up(range, 6 months to 1 year). At final follow-up, VAS of back pain was 3.75 ±0.87. ODI was (32.33 ±17.11)%, AH was 0.97±0.12cm, KA was 19.08°±1.00°, which remained unchanged compared with those of two days after operation(P>0.05). Conclusions: For middle and upper thoracic SVCF, PVP can alleviate back pain effectively and safely, however, PVP is of no effect to correct the AH and KA.