CAJ | 학술논문

通过探讨从众论、相对论、利己论、目的论和义务论五种学术职业价值观对学术行为取向的影响，发现义务论价值观在负责任的研究行为、受质疑的研究行为以及学术不端行为中均得到显著性的验证；从众论价值观在负责任的学术行为中得到验证。研究结论印证了对学术行为的义务责任可能存在认知误区，但可借此对学术行为的义务性价值取向的认知，厘清学术组织的规范责任，注重学术共同体价值观与个体学术行为目标的分层整合。
통과탐토종음론、상대론、이기론、목적론화의무론오충학술직업개치관대학술행위취향적영향，발현의무론개치관재부책임적연구행위、수질의적연구행위이급학술불단행위중균득도현저성적험증；종음론개치관재부책임적학술행위중득도험증。연구결론인증료대학술행위적의무책임가능존재인지오구，단가차차대학술행위적의무성개치취향적인지，전청학술조직적규범책임，주중학술공동체개치관여개체학술행위목표적분층정합。
This study respectively reviews the impact of five academic occupational values, including conformity, relativity, self-interest, teleology and deontology on academic behavior orientation. It has found that the deontological value orientation was tested and verified, not only in area of responsible research conduct, but also in questioned behavior and academic misconduct, so did conformity value in responsible conduct of research. These results suggest that there is some cognitive misunderstanding. In addition, cognitive academic behavior based on obligation value orientation should be used to clarify the responsibility norms of academic organizations, to demonstrate the spirit of academic behavioral contract as well as emphasize on layered integration of academic community values together with individual academic goals.