中国医学装备
中國醫學裝備
중국의학장비
CHINA MEDICAL EQUIPMENT
2012年
4期
72-73
,共2页
艾迪注射液%化疗%老年淋巴瘤
艾迪註射液%化療%老年淋巴瘤
애적주사액%화료%노년림파류
Addie injection%Chemotherapy%Elderly patients with lymphoma
目的：比较艾迪、艾迪联合化疗、化疗治疗老年非霍奇金淋巴瘤的近期疗效和不良反应。方法：艾迪组20例、艾迪联合化疗组19例、化疗组20例;采用CHOP或CVP方案化疗。结果：艾迪组、艾迪注射液联合化疗组、化疗组的有效率（CR＋PR）分别为15%、47.3%、40%。结论：艾迪注射液联合化疗效果显著,优于单用艾迪注射液和单用化疗组,为老年淋巴瘤姑息治疗的良好选择。
目的：比較艾迪、艾迪聯閤化療、化療治療老年非霍奇金淋巴瘤的近期療效和不良反應。方法：艾迪組20例、艾迪聯閤化療組19例、化療組20例;採用CHOP或CVP方案化療。結果：艾迪組、艾迪註射液聯閤化療組、化療組的有效率（CR＋PR）分彆為15%、47.3%、40%。結論：艾迪註射液聯閤化療效果顯著,優于單用艾迪註射液和單用化療組,為老年淋巴瘤姑息治療的良好選擇。
목적：비교애적、애적연합화료、화료치료노년비곽기금림파류적근기료효화불량반응。방법：애적조20례、애적연합화료조19례、화료조20례;채용CHOP혹CVP방안화료。결과：애적조、애적주사액연합화료조、화료조적유효솔（CR＋PR）분별위15%、47.3%、40%。결론：애적주사액연합화료효과현저,우우단용애적주사액화단용화료조,위노년림파류고식치료적량호선택。
Objective：To compare the short-term efficacy and adverse reaction among Addie,Addie combined with chemotherapy and chemotherapy for treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in elderly patients.Methods：Different treatments were applied in Addie group of 20 cases,Addie combined with chemotherapy group of 19 and chemotherapy group of 20.Then the short-term efficacy and adverse reaction were observed in all the 3 groups.Results：The effective rate in the Addie group,Addie injection combined with chemotherapy group,chemotherapy group efficiency（CR＋PR） was 15%,47.3% and 40%,respectively.Conclusion：Addie injection combined with chemotherapy has significantly better effect than the single Addie injection and chemotherapy alone groups,which is a good option for palliative treatment of lymphoma in aged patients.
