中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2013年
31期
3853-3855
,共3页
口腔卫生%口腔护理%护理结局分类
口腔衛生%口腔護理%護理結跼分類
구강위생%구강호리%호리결국분류
Oral hygiene%Oral care%Nursing outcomes classification
目的 探讨口腔科患者实施护理结局分类法对患者口腔卫生的改善效果.方法 采取随机抽样法选取2010年1月至2012年12月收治的120例患者,根据分层随机分组法分为观察组与对照组各60例,对照组给予常规护理,观察组在常规护理的基础上采取护理结局分类法进行护理.比较两组患者的口腔卫生改善情况.结果 观察组口腔黏膜优良率为75.00％ (45/60),对照组为30.00％ (18/60),两组比较差异有统计学意义(x2 =24.361,P＜0.05);观察组SCL-90量表焦虑、恐惧、抑郁、敌对、躯体化项目得分分别为(11.6±2.6),(8.7±1.7),(9.3±1.7),(9.2±1.3),(12.5±1.9)分,分别低于对照组的(19.3±3.1),(13.6±1.6),(13.2±2.2),(12.8±1.8),(18.2±2.2)分,差异均有统计学意义(t值分别为-9.447,-10.237,-7.005,-8.136,-9.712;P＜0.05).护理后观察组NOC-口腔卫生评分标准各项得分均高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.05).结论 对口腔科患者采取护理结局分类法进行护理干预,显著改善了患者口腔卫生整体情况,提高了患者的生活质量.
目的 探討口腔科患者實施護理結跼分類法對患者口腔衛生的改善效果.方法 採取隨機抽樣法選取2010年1月至2012年12月收治的120例患者,根據分層隨機分組法分為觀察組與對照組各60例,對照組給予常規護理,觀察組在常規護理的基礎上採取護理結跼分類法進行護理.比較兩組患者的口腔衛生改善情況.結果 觀察組口腔黏膜優良率為75.00％ (45/60),對照組為30.00％ (18/60),兩組比較差異有統計學意義(x2 =24.361,P＜0.05);觀察組SCL-90量錶焦慮、恐懼、抑鬱、敵對、軀體化項目得分分彆為(11.6±2.6),(8.7±1.7),(9.3±1.7),(9.2±1.3),(12.5±1.9)分,分彆低于對照組的(19.3±3.1),(13.6±1.6),(13.2±2.2),(12.8±1.8),(18.2±2.2)分,差異均有統計學意義(t值分彆為-9.447,-10.237,-7.005,-8.136,-9.712;P＜0.05).護理後觀察組NOC-口腔衛生評分標準各項得分均高于對照組,差異均有統計學意義(P＜0.05).結論 對口腔科患者採取護理結跼分類法進行護理榦預,顯著改善瞭患者口腔衛生整體情況,提高瞭患者的生活質量.
목적 탐토구강과환자실시호리결국분류법대환자구강위생적개선효과.방법 채취수궤추양법선취2010년1월지2012년12월수치적120례환자,근거분층수궤분조법분위관찰조여대조조각60례,대조조급여상규호리,관찰조재상규호리적기출상채취호리결국분류법진행호리.비교량조환자적구강위생개선정황.결과 관찰조구강점막우량솔위75.00％ (45/60),대조조위30.00％ (18/60),량조비교차이유통계학의의(x2 =24.361,P＜0.05);관찰조SCL-90량표초필、공구、억욱、활대、구체화항목득분분별위(11.6±2.6),(8.7±1.7),(9.3±1.7),(9.2±1.3),(12.5±1.9)분,분별저우대조조적(19.3±3.1),(13.6±1.6),(13.2±2.2),(12.8±1.8),(18.2±2.2)분,차이균유통계학의의(t치분별위-9.447,-10.237,-7.005,-8.136,-9.712;P＜0.05).호리후관찰조NOC-구강위생평분표준각항득분균고우대조조,차이균유통계학의의(P＜0.05).결론 대구강과환자채취호리결국분류법진행호리간예,현저개선료환자구강위생정체정황,제고료환자적생활질량.
Objective To observe and explore the effect of nursing outcomes classification (NOC) on the improvement of oral hygiene in dental patients.Methods A total of 120 patients who were treated from January 2010 to December 2012 were selected by using random sampling method,who were divided into observation group and control group according to stratified randomization,60 patients in the control group with routine nursing and 60 patients in the observation group with nursing outcomes classification based on routine nursing.The improvement of oral hygiene was compared between the two groups.Results The excellent and good rate of oral mucosa in the observation group was 75.00％ (45/60) and 30.00％ (18/60) in the control group,and there was significant difference between the two groups (x2 =24.361,P ＜ 0.05).The SCL-90 scale scores of anxiety,fear,depression,hostility,somatization in the observation group were lower than those in the control group [(11.6±2.6) vs (19.3±3.1),(8.7±1.7) vs (13.6±1.6),(9.3±1.7) vs (13.2±2.2),(9.2±1.3) vs (12.8 ± 1.8),(12.5 ± 1.9) vs (18.2 ±2.2)],and these differences were statistically significant(t =-9.447,-10.237,-7.005,-8.136,-9.712,respectively;P ＜0.05).All scores of NOC-oral hygiene in the observation group were higher than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant (P ＜ 0.05).Conclusions The implementation of nursing outcomes classification in oral nursing intervention of dental patients can significantly improve the overall condition of oral health in patients,and improve the quality of life.
