广州化工
廣州化工
엄주화공
GUANGZHOU CHEMICAL INDUSTRY AND TECHNOLOGY
2012年
20期
91-93
,共3页
氢火焰离子化检测器%电子捕获检测器%卤代烃%胶粘剂
氫火燄離子化檢測器%電子捕穫檢測器%滷代烴%膠粘劑
경화염리자화검측기%전자포획검측기%서대경%효점제
hydrogen flame ionization detector%electron capture detector%halogenated hydrocarbon%adhesive
采用氢火焰离子化检测器与电子捕获检测器两种方法对胶粘剂中四种卤代烃的含量进行测定。通过比较,两种方法操作简便,结果比较准确;但两种方法的灵敏度、检测限及线性范围有较大区别,实用范围不同。
採用氫火燄離子化檢測器與電子捕穫檢測器兩種方法對膠粘劑中四種滷代烴的含量進行測定。通過比較,兩種方法操作簡便,結果比較準確;但兩種方法的靈敏度、檢測限及線性範圍有較大區彆,實用範圍不同。
채용경화염리자화검측기여전자포획검측기량충방법대효점제중사충서대경적함량진행측정。통과비교,량충방법조작간편,결과비교준학;단량충방법적령민도、검측한급선성범위유교대구별,실용범위불동。
The hydrogen flame ionization detector and electron capture detector were used to determinate the content of four kinds of halogenated hydrocarbons in adhesives method.By comparison,these two methods were simple,and had accurate results.But the sensitivity of these two methods,the detection limit,the linear range and practialrange were different.
