河北科技师范学院学报:社会科学版
河北科技師範學院學報:社會科學版
하북과기사범학원학보:사회과학판
Journal of Hebei Normal UNiversity of Science & Technology :Social Sciences
2012年
3期
116-119
,共4页
王娜%宋军强%贾周圣%肖艳
王娜%宋軍彊%賈週聖%肖豔
왕나%송군강%가주골%초염
法律%道德%合法不合道德%突围路径
法律%道德%閤法不閤道德%突圍路徑
법률%도덕%합법불합도덕%돌위로경
law%moral%legal but unethical%breakout path
以合法不合道德行为为研究对象,通过分析中西不同文化背景下法律与道德关系,总结出导致该行为的两个主要原因。一方面是因为现行法律与社会伦理道德脱节,使许多违背道德的丑恶行为不能受到现行法律的制裁;另一方面是由于法律与道德适用的范围不同,法律是划分罪与非罪,合法与违法的标准,道德则主要是划分善与恶的准绳,这两种界限在一定范围内重合但同时存在不重叠的部分。针对社会中屡屡出现的合法不合道德的现象,提出制定良法,引发公民自觉性;去除障碍,充分发挥道德作用;在坚持法律权威前提下,强化道德评价作用;依据道德构建指导法律实践的价值评判,使部分道德内化为法律的措施。
以閤法不閤道德行為為研究對象,通過分析中西不同文化揹景下法律與道德關繫,總結齣導緻該行為的兩箇主要原因。一方麵是因為現行法律與社會倫理道德脫節,使許多違揹道德的醜噁行為不能受到現行法律的製裁;另一方麵是由于法律與道德適用的範圍不同,法律是劃分罪與非罪,閤法與違法的標準,道德則主要是劃分善與噁的準繩,這兩種界限在一定範圍內重閤但同時存在不重疊的部分。針對社會中屢屢齣現的閤法不閤道德的現象,提齣製定良法,引髮公民自覺性;去除障礙,充分髮揮道德作用;在堅持法律權威前提下,彊化道德評價作用;依據道德構建指導法律實踐的價值評判,使部分道德內化為法律的措施。
이합법불합도덕행위위연구대상,통과분석중서불동문화배경하법률여도덕관계,총결출도치해행위적량개주요원인。일방면시인위현행법률여사회윤리도덕탈절,사허다위배도덕적축악행위불능수도현행법률적제재;령일방면시유우법률여도덕괄용적범위불동,법률시화분죄여비죄,합법여위법적표준,도덕칙주요시화분선여악적준승,저량충계한재일정범위내중합단동시존재불중첩적부분。침대사회중루루출현적합법불합도덕적현상,제출제정량법,인발공민자각성;거제장애,충분발휘도덕작용;재견지법률권위전제하,강화도덕평개작용;의거도덕구건지도법률실천적개치평판,사부분도덕내화위법률적조시。
The research object of this paper is legitimate immoral behavior, analyzing Chinese and Western culture background of different relationship between law and morality, it found out two main reasons for the behavior. On one hand, due to the current legal and social ethical disconnection, many immoral behavior cant be sanctioned by current legal regulations; On the other hand, because legal and moral scope is different, the law is divided into crime and non - crime or legal and iUegal, morality is the mainly criterion of dividing good and evil, these two boundaries are in a certain range of coincidence but do not overlap, so the legitimate unethical behavior exists. In view of the society frequent legal unethical phenomenon, it can be reduced or even stopped from the following four aspects: to develop good law to arouse citizen consciousness; to remove obstacles for the function of moral; to strengthen the moral evalua tion function on the premise of insisting legal authority; to make some ethics converting into laws according to value judgment based on the moral construction.