防灾科技学院学报
防災科技學院學報
방재과기학원학보
JOURNAL OF INSTITUTE OF DISASTER-PREVENTION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
2012年
3期
49-52
,共4页
FHD-1核旋磁力仪%CB3磁变仪%日变幅%日均值
FHD-1覈鏇磁力儀%CB3磁變儀%日變幅%日均值
FHD-1핵선자력의%CB3자변의%일변폭%일균치
FHD-1 nuclear precession magnetometer%CB3 geomagnetic variometer%daily amplitude%mean annual change shape
本文选取泾阳地磁台2007年FHD-1核旋磁力仪和CB3磁变仪观测数据采用日变幅形态、日均值年变形态、总场21点值年变形态等方法做对比分析。结果表明:两种观测一致性较好,说明数字化仪器观测的数据是可靠的,但是数字化仪器还存在易受外界环境干扰,稳定性不好的问题,需要工作人员按规范调试仪器,认真维护与管理。
本文選取涇暘地磁檯2007年FHD-1覈鏇磁力儀和CB3磁變儀觀測數據採用日變幅形態、日均值年變形態、總場21點值年變形態等方法做對比分析。結果錶明:兩種觀測一緻性較好,說明數字化儀器觀測的數據是可靠的,但是數字化儀器還存在易受外界環境榦擾,穩定性不好的問題,需要工作人員按規範調試儀器,認真維護與管理。
본문선취경양지자태2007년FHD-1핵선자력의화CB3자변의관측수거채용일변폭형태、일균치년변형태、총장21점치년변형태등방법주대비분석。결과표명:량충관측일치성교호,설명수자화의기관측적수거시가고적,단시수자화의기환존재역수외계배경간우,은정성불호적문제,수요공작인원안규범조시의기,인진유호여관리。
This article selects observation data of FHD-I nuclear precession magnetometer and CB3 geomagnetic variometer at Jingyang Geomagnetic Seismic Station in 2007, and makes comparative analysis in terms of the daily amplitude, mean annual change shape, and total intensity magnetic field. The results show that two kinds of observation have good consistency, and digital instrument observation data are reliable, but the digital instrument is vulnerable to external environment interference and is not stable enough, and needs careful maintenance and management.