浙江工贸职业技术学院学报
浙江工貿職業技術學院學報
절강공무직업기술학원학보
JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG INDUSTRY & TRADE POLYTECHNIC
2012年
1期
65-68
,共4页
王羲之%王献之%《兰亭》书法%刍议
王羲之%王獻之%《蘭亭》書法%芻議
왕희지%왕헌지%《란정》서법%추의
WANG Xi-zhi%WANG Xian-zhi%Calligraphy of Preface to the Orchid Pavilion Collection%discussion
王羲之、王献之书法，各有千秋。唐之前书史对其评价比较客观。唐之后，由于唐太宗偏爱或政治需要，力推王羲之书，王羲之“书圣”地位遂立，王献之名走向衰微。王羲之《兰亭》书法，名动天下，但有些名实脱略。功力欠佳，风格近俗，相对王羲之其他作品言，应是较差的。我们对待前贤经典，要客观求实，不必人云亦云，盲目崇拜。
王羲之、王獻之書法，各有韆鞦。唐之前書史對其評價比較客觀。唐之後，由于唐太宗偏愛或政治需要，力推王羲之書，王羲之“書聖”地位遂立，王獻之名走嚮衰微。王羲之《蘭亭》書法，名動天下，但有些名實脫略。功力欠佳，風格近俗，相對王羲之其他作品言，應是較差的。我們對待前賢經典，要客觀求實，不必人雲亦雲，盲目崇拜。
왕희지、왕헌지서법，각유천추。당지전서사대기평개비교객관。당지후，유우당태종편애혹정치수요，력추왕희지서，왕희지“서골”지위수립，왕헌지명주향쇠미。왕희지《란정》서법，명동천하，단유사명실탈략。공력흠가，풍격근속，상대왕희지기타작품언，응시교차적。아문대대전현경전，요객관구실，불필인운역운，맹목숭배。
Calligraphic arts of WANG Xi-zhi and WANG Xian-zhi are distinguished by various qualities. Historical records before Tang dynasty evaluate them impersonally. However, because of the personal fondness of TANG-Taizong or political requirement, the calligraphy of WANG Xi-zhi was recommended strongly after Tang dynasty. While WANG Xi-zhi earned the position of the supreme calligrapher of China, however, WANG Xian-zhi lost his reputation gradually. Although the fame of WANG Xi-zhi＇s Preface to the Orchid Pavilion Collection fills the land, it doesn＇t deserve the name too much. Compared with other works of WANG Xi-zhi, the unsuccessful competence and stereotypical style is relatively poor. We should treat the classics of former worthies objectively but not get conformed or blinded.
