CAJ | 학술논문

在重新审判“发回”重审死刑案件的司法实践中，对被告人容易产生有罪推定的倾向、依据补强证据再次适用死刑的倾向和漠视侦控行为合法性的倾向，为此重审法院应杜绝片面依据侦控机关提供的不利于被告人的存疑补强证据，对被告人再次适用死刑；对“事实不清、证据不足型”发回重审的死刑案件，如果经过重审认定的案件事实没有发生重大变化，一般也不宜对被告人再次适用死刑。
재중신심판“발회”중심사형안건적사법실천중，대피고인용역산생유죄추정적경향、의거보강증거재차괄용사형적경향화막시정공행위합법성적경향，위차중심법원응두절편면의거정공궤관제공적불리우피고인적존의보강증거，대피고인재차괄용사형；대“사실불청、증거불족형”발회중심적사형안건，여과경과중심인정적안건사실몰유발생중대변화，일반야불의대피고인재차괄용사형。
In the judicial practice of rehearing a ＂referring back＂ case to review its death sentence, for the accused there＇ s likely to be the trend of presumption of guilt, the trend of re - applying death sentence according to corroborative evidence and the trend of ignoring the legality of investigation and control. Therefore, the re - trial court should prohibit re -applying death sentence to the accused only according to the doubtful corroborative evi- dence provided by investigative departments. For the death adequate evidence and is referred back to review, if the fact not proper to reapply death sentence to the accused. sentence case which is the type with vague fact and inhas no big change after being identified, generally it is