CAJ | 학술논문

目前我国的刑事立法并没有对不纯正的不作为犯作出明确的规定,但是在刑事司法实践中却对不纯正的不作为犯进行定罪处刑,这种矛盾造成了立法与司法的脱节。而解决这个矛盾的关键就在于对不纯正不作为犯的作为义务进行精准的界定,对其作为义务的范围规定的过宽,有可能导致刑法的泛化和刑罚的膨胀,有损刑法的谦抑性原则;反之,对作为义务的界定过窄,则使刑法的处罚范围过小,有损刑法的法益保护机能。因此,科学、准确的明晰不纯正不作为犯的作为义务,对我国的刑事理论和刑事司法都大有裨益。
목전아국적형사입법병몰유대불순정적불작위범작출명학적규정,단시재형사사법실천중각대불순정적불작위범진행정죄처형,저충모순조성료입법여사법적탈절。이해결저개모순적관건취재우대불순정불작위범적작위의무진행정준적계정,대기작위의무적범위규정적과관,유가능도치형법적범화화형벌적팽창,유손형법적겸억성원칙;반지,대작위의무적계정과착,칙사형법적처벌범위과소,유손형법적법익보호궤능。인차,과학、준학적명석불순정불작위범적작위의무,대아국적형사이론화형사사법도대유비익。
At present,China＇s criminal legislation did not impure,not as committed to clearly defined,but in criminal justice practice but then not pure conviction and sentence are not as committed,this conflict resulted in a mismatch between the legislative and judicial.The solution to this conflict is the key to the impure are not as guilty as the obligation for accurate definition of the scope of its provisions as an obligation too broad,it may result in criminal penalties of generalization and expansion of criminal damage Qian the principle of suppression;the contrary,the definition is too narrow as an obligation,then the scope of criminal penalties is too small,detrimental to the protection of legal interests of criminal law function.Therefore,scientific and accurate clarity is not pure not as guilty as the obligation,to China＇s criminal theory and criminal justice are of great benefit.