CAJ | 학술논문

为研究高校体育课程内容标准体系，在高校一线公共体育教师与专家之间，对前期基于德尔菲法筛选的30项高校课程内容标准指标进行认同程度差异检验；采用德尔菲法，进行了2轮“背靠背”专家征询。结果表明，高校体育课程内容标准指标达到了具有显著性水平的评价主体一致性信度(W＝0.628，χ2-近似＝75.89，P＜0.05)；有24项指标的内容效度比(CVR)均在0.5以上。最终研制出具有一定评价主体信度和内容效度的“大学体育课程内容标准指标体系”，为下一轮制定普通高校体育课程教学指导文件提供理论与实践支持。
위연구고교체육과정내용표준체계，재고교일선공공체육교사여전가지간，대전기기우덕이비법사선적30항고교과정내용표준지표진행인동정도차이검험；채용덕이비법，진행료2륜“배고배”전가정순。결과표명，고교체육과정내용표준지표체도료구유현저성수평적평개주체일치성신도(W＝0.628，χ2-근사＝75.89，P＜0.05)；유24항지표적내용효도비(CVR)균재0.5이상。최종연제출구유일정평개주체신도화내용효도적“대학체육과정내용표준지표체계”，위하일륜제정보통고교체육과정교학지도문건제공이론여실천지지。
In order to study the college physical education curriculum content standard system, the authors ran an approval degree difference test on 30 college curriculum content standard indexes previously screened out based on the Delphi method between front line college public physical education teachers and experts by means of question-naire survey and comparative study paradigm, carried out 2 rounds of“back to back”expert consultation by using the Delphi method, and revealed the following findings:college physical education curriculum content standard in-dexes had achieved a significant level of evaluation subject consistency reliability (W=0.628;χ2-approximate=75.89, P<0.05);the content validity ratios (CVR) of 24 indexes therein were over 0.5. Ultimately the authors developed a“college physical education curriculum content standard system” with certain evaluation subject consistency reli-ability and content validity, provided theoretical and practical support for establishing regular college physical edu-cation curriculum teaching guidance documents in the next round.