CAJ | 학술논문

政策评价不仅仅是检验政策的效果、效益和效率的基本途径,也是决定政策去向及合理配置资源的重要手段.本研究采用基于专家导向的政策评价模式,对已采用或正在采用的额济纳绿洲生态系统恢复政策与措施进行了评价.结果发现：＂黑河分水工程＂是所有政策中最重要且执行落实最好的政策,执行指数高达4.03;水资源类政策中＂保证地下水水位供给＂重要却落实不好;土地类政策中＂防治沙漠化、盐碱化＂重要也落实不好;植被类政策中＂围栏封育＂、＂圈养舍饲＂两项政策重要,执行落实较好;综合类政策中＂加强生态环境的动态监测与评估＂重要,执行落实情况却不如不重要的＂生态移民工程＂政策.＂生态补偿＂是执行落实最差的政策,执行指数低达1.33;＂防治水质恶化＂执行落实情况次之,执行指数为1.93.政策执行的好的原因是政策内容清晰,便于操作,执行不好的原因反之.
정책평개불부부시검험정책적효과、효익화효솔적기본도경,야시결정정책거향급합리배치자원적중요수단.본연구채용기우전가도향적정책평개모식,대이채용혹정재채용적액제납록주생태계통회복정책여조시진행료평개.결과발현：＂흑하분수공정＂시소유정책중최중요차집행락실최호적정책,집행지수고체4.03;수자원류정책중＂보증지하수수위공급＂중요각락실불호;토지류정책중＂방치사막화、염감화＂중요야락실불호;식피류정책중＂위란봉육＂、＂권양사사＂량항정책중요,집행락실교호;종합류정책중＂가강생태배경적동태감측여평고＂중요,집행락실정황각불여불중요적＂생태이민공정＂정책.＂생태보상＂시집행락실최차적정책,집행지수저체1.33;＂방치수질악화＂집행락실정황차지,집행지수위1.93.정책집행적호적원인시정책내용청석,편우조작,집행불호적원인반지.
Policy evaluation is not only the basic approach to testing the effect,effectiveness and efficiency of policies,but also an important means for the rational allocation of resources and policy decisions.Based on a model of expert guidance,an evaluation of the ecological recovery policies and measures taken in the Ejina oasis made.It was found that the policy of ＂Heihe River water project＂ was not only important but also should be best implemented in the practice of the ecosystem restoration polices and the index of policy implementation was 4.03.The policy of ＂To ensure the groundwater supplies＂ was important but not implemented well among the water resource policies.The policy of ＂combat desertification,salinization＂ was important but not well implemented among the land policies.The policies of ＂fencing＂ and ＂captive care feed＂ were two important policies but not implemented well among the vegetation policies.The policy of ＂to strengthen the dynamic ecological environment monitoring and assessment＂ was important but not implemented as well as ＂ecological migration project＂ policy among the comprehensive policies.And the policy of ＂ecological compensation＂ was the worst implementation in all policies and the index of policy implementation was 1.33.Following was ＂prevention and control of water quality deterioration＂ with a value of 1.93.The reason for better implementation of some policies is because the content of the policies are clear and easy to operate while the reasons for poor implementation of the policy are on the contrary.