CAJ | 학술논문

目的对比分析心理护理干预和常规护理对急性心肌梗死患者疗效的影响.方法回顾性分析2006年1月至2011年12月我院急诊监护室收治的92例急性心肌梗死患者分为心理护理干预组和常规护理组的临床治疗资料.对比两组干预前后的焦虑评分和溶栓治疗后的再通率.结果两组干预前焦虑评分无明显差异,干预后心理护理干预组焦虑评分明显低于常规护理组；溶栓治疗后心理护理干预组再通率明显高于常规治疗组.结论心理护理干预较常规护理更能降低患者焦虑,且能提高溶栓治疗的再通率.
목적 대비분석심리호리간예화상규호리대급성심기경사환자료효적영향.방법 회고성분석2006년1월지2011년12월아원급진감호실수치적92례급성심기경사환자분위심리호리간예조화상규호리조적림상치료자료.대비량조간예전후적초필평분화용전치료후적재통솔.결과 량조간예전초필평분무명현차이,간예후심리호리간예조초필평분명현저우상규호리조；용전치료후심리호리간예조재통솔명현고우상규치료조.결론 심리호리간예교상규호리경능강저환자초필,차능제고용전치료적재통솔.
Objective To compare and analyze the effects of psychological nursing intervention and conventional care on the efficacy in patients with acute myocardial infarction.Methods The clinical data on 92 patients with acute myocardial infarction who had been treated in the emergency department during the period of January 2006 to December 2011.The patients were divided into psychological intervention group and conventional care group.Scores for anxiety and rate of recanalization rate after thrombolytic therapy were compared between the two groups before and after intervention.Results Scores for anxiety did not differ significantly between the two groups before intervention.After intervention,scores for anxiety were markedly lower in were no differences in psychological care group after the intervention anxiety scores were significantly lower in psychological intervention than in conventional care group,and rate of recanalization was significantly higher in psychological intervention group than in conventional care group after thrombolytic therapy.Conclusions Psychological nursing intervention is easier to reduce patient anxiety than conventional care and can improve rate of recanalization by thrombolytic therapy