CAJ | 학술논문

将工程事故的伦理责任都归咎于工程师是不合理的。事实上，工程师在工程活动中通常并不具有独立性的技术话语权，由此他们并不能成为工程事故伦理责任主要承担者。本文以“甬温线事故”为例，辨析了工程事故的伦理责任主体，认为作为工程活动的决策与管理机构的工程组织主体不仅可以成为伦理责任主体，同时还应是工程事故伦理责任的主要承担者。工程组织主体及其负责人伦理责任缺失还是导致工程伦理实践困境的根本原因。
장공정사고적윤리책임도귀구우공정사시불합리적。사실상，공정사재공정활동중통상병불구유독립성적기술화어권，유차타문병불능성위공정사고윤리책임주요승담자。본문이“용온선사고”위례，변석료공정사고적윤리책임주체，인위작위공정활동적결책여관리궤구적공정조직주체불부가이성위윤리책임주체，동시환응시공정사고윤리책임적주요승담자。공정조직주체급기부책인윤리책임결실환시도치공정윤리실천곤경적근본원인。
Heaping ethical responsibility of engineering accident upon engineers is unreasonable. The fact is that engineers dont have a voice in technological decisions, so they are not supposed to take the ethical responsi- bility in engineering accidents. This paper differentiates and analyzes the subjects of ethical responsibility in the case of "7.23 Yongwen Railway Disaster", and the authors believe that the engineering organizations who are in possession of the fight of making decisions and management should be the subjects of ethical responsibility. Fur- thermore, they must take the main ethical responsibility in engineering accidents concerned. The absence of ethi- cal responsibility in the subjects of engineering organization and its head is the deciding cause for the practical di- lemma of engineering ethics.