CAJ | 학술논문

通过在大学生心理健康课堂中设置了常规讲授、案例讨论、专题讨论、团体辅导和综合法五种教学方法,以416名学生为对象,运用方差分析比较了五种教学方法的教学效果。结果显示：学生更喜欢团体辅导的教学方式,而且这种方式在调动学生参与性和课堂氛围上优势明显;综合法的教学方式在调动学生思考、让学生产生学习内容重要性感知上优势最明显;专题讨论的教学方式在授课主题明确性、师生互动效果上更具优势。
통과재대학생심리건강과당중설치료상규강수、안례토론、전제토론、단체보도화종합법오충교학방법,이416명학생위대상,운용방차분석비교료오충교학방법적교학효과。결과현시：학생경희환단체보도적교학방식,이차저충방식재조동학생삼여성화과당분위상우세명현;종합법적교학방식재조동학생사고、양학생산생학습내용중요성감지상우세최명현;전제토론적교학방식재수과주제명학성、사생호동효과상경구우세。
By using the variance analytical methods and taking 416 students as the target,this paper compares the teaching effect of the five teaching approaches of regular teaching,case study discussion,special topic discussion,group counseling and comprehensive method.The results show that the students like the group counseling method more,which can mobilize their initiative and create the classroom atmosphere better;the method of comprehensive study had clear advantages in arousing students’ thinking and helping them study the contents;the method of special topic discussion has a better effect of making the topic teaching clear and producing teacher-and-students interaction.