哈尔滨工业大学学报：社会科学版
哈爾濱工業大學學報：社會科學版
합이빈공업대학학보：사회과학판
Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)
2012年
6期
8-14
,共7页
灾难%多学科交叉%社会心态%应激%心理原始化回归
災難%多學科交扠%社會心態%應激%心理原始化迴歸
재난%다학과교차%사회심태%응격%심리원시화회귀
disaster%interdisciplinary%social mentality%stress%psychological primitive regression
从“生物-心理-社会”的视角全面地探讨灾难情境下的人们的社会心态变化规律及其特点有一定的学术价值。生物学视角的研究成果表明，灾难后的心理行为变化源于人类前额叶的高级认知控制功能受到应激影响的条件下转变为由杏仁核所主导的快速情绪反应模式。心理学视角的研究分析认为，灾难后的心理行为变化可看做进化心理学和精神分析理论双重意义上的心理原始化过程。社会文化视角的分析认为，灾难后的心理行为变化可看做一种社会文化心态模式从“平时状态”向“灾难应急模式”的转换。这三个视角的研究分析既有内在本质的联系，也遵循各自不同的逻辑，只有将这三个视角结合起来考虑，我们才能获得对于灾难后社会心态变化的全面认识。
從“生物-心理-社會”的視角全麵地探討災難情境下的人們的社會心態變化規律及其特點有一定的學術價值。生物學視角的研究成果錶明，災難後的心理行為變化源于人類前額葉的高級認知控製功能受到應激影響的條件下轉變為由杏仁覈所主導的快速情緒反應模式。心理學視角的研究分析認為，災難後的心理行為變化可看做進化心理學和精神分析理論雙重意義上的心理原始化過程。社會文化視角的分析認為，災難後的心理行為變化可看做一種社會文化心態模式從“平時狀態”嚮“災難應急模式”的轉換。這三箇視角的研究分析既有內在本質的聯繫，也遵循各自不同的邏輯，隻有將這三箇視角結閤起來攷慮，我們纔能穫得對于災難後社會心態變化的全麵認識。
종“생물-심리-사회”적시각전면지탐토재난정경하적인문적사회심태변화규률급기특점유일정적학술개치。생물학시각적연구성과표명，재난후적심리행위변화원우인류전액협적고급인지공제공능수도응격영향적조건하전변위유행인핵소주도적쾌속정서반응모식。심이학시각적연구분석인위，재난후적심리행위변화가간주진화심이학화정신분석이론쌍중의의상적심리원시화과정。사회문화시각적분석인위，재난후적심리행위변화가간주일충사회문화심태모식종“평시상태”향“재난응급모식”적전환。저삼개시각적연구분석기유내재본질적련계，야준순각자불동적라집，지유장저삼개시각결합기래고필，아문재능획득대우재난후사회심태변화적전면인식。
This paper examines and discusses the characteristics of social mentality during and after dis- aster from biological, psychological and social perspective. Biological study shows that human behavior and cognition area are usually regulated by the frontal cortex During and after the disaster, however, people might experience stress and switch to a more rapid and emotionalized responsive pattern supported by the function of amygdala. The research on psychological perspective finds that the psychological and behavioral changes after disaster are the process of primitive regression based on the theory of evolutional psychology and psychoanaly- sis. From social and cultural perspective, the human behavior in the disaster situation embodied the pattern and characteristics of social mentality shifted from daily state to disaster emergency. Studies and analyses on one hand are inherently interrelated, while they follow different disciplinary logics on the other hand. Only combining the three perspectives can we achieve a comprehensive recognition of social mentality changes dur- ing and after disaster.
