证据科学
證據科學
증거과학
EVIDENCE SEIENCE
2012年
3期
297-312
,共16页
法律法规%行业规范%过度依赖%医疗损害责任
法律法規%行業規範%過度依賴%醫療損害責任
법율법규%행업규범%과도의뢰%의료손해책임
Statutory provisions%Professional practice%Excessive deference%Liability for medical damage
我国法中存在着在侵权法问题的判定上过度依赖“法律法规”、“行业标准”和“诊疗规范”的倾向。这些“外在”标准替代了法官对法律“内在”规则的审视和适用。行业标准替代了法律标准。比如．在医疗过失判定标准上，法官过度依赖“诊疗规范”，忽视了基本法律标准——注意义务违反说和“合理医生”标准——的探寻和适用。我国法应纠正此种现象，注意对法律规则．比如医疗过失和因果关系判定规则的细心构建，以给法官具体指导。“法律法规”、“行业标准”和“诊疗规范”在侵权法中是判定过失的重要标准．但不是终局性和根本性标准。
我國法中存在著在侵權法問題的判定上過度依賴“法律法規”、“行業標準”和“診療規範”的傾嚮。這些“外在”標準替代瞭法官對法律“內在”規則的審視和適用。行業標準替代瞭法律標準。比如．在醫療過失判定標準上，法官過度依賴“診療規範”，忽視瞭基本法律標準——註意義務違反說和“閤理醫生”標準——的探尋和適用。我國法應糾正此種現象，註意對法律規則．比如醫療過失和因果關繫判定規則的細心構建，以給法官具體指導。“法律法規”、“行業標準”和“診療規範”在侵權法中是判定過失的重要標準．但不是終跼性和根本性標準。
아국법중존재착재침권법문제적판정상과도의뢰“법율법규”、“행업표준”화“진료규범”적경향。저사“외재”표준체대료법관대법률“내재”규칙적심시화괄용。행업표준체대료법률표준。비여．재의료과실판정표준상，법관과도의뢰“진료규범”，홀시료기본법률표준——주의의무위반설화“합리의생”표준——적탐심화괄용。아국법응규정차충현상，주의대법률규칙．비여의료과실화인과관계판정규칙적세심구건，이급법관구체지도。“법율법규”、“행업표준”화“진료규범”재침권법중시판정과실적중요표준．단불시종국성화근본성표준。
There is a tendency in Chinese law to excessively defer to statutory provisions, professional practice and clinical guidelines when examining key tort issues. External standards are used as substitutes for legal standards. For example, in establishing medical negligence, courts usually pay excessive deference to professional guidelines and fail to cite and apply the legal standards, such as the theory of breach of the duty of care and the ＂reasonable doctor＂ standard. Chinese law needs to pay more attention to construction, improvement and application of legal principles and rules, and provide judges with more detailed guidance. Statutory provisions, professional practice and clinical guidelines are very importam evidence in tort law, but they are not conclusive in establishing negligence.
