CAJ | 학술논문

基于发展经济学框架对苏南模式、温州模式和珠三角模式进行再比较,该三种模式在供求导向、关键制约要素的获得渠道、企业家群体、企业目标和生产组织方式方面均存在较大不同。通过区分固化的区域发展模式和动态的区域发展,可以发现区域经济发展始终伴随着对固化模式的突破和保留,模式发源地的经济发展会出现更多的趋同。其他地方不能简单套用这三种发展模式,要根据现实情况组合三种模式的不同特征以求更好发展。
기우발전경제학광가대소남모식、온주모식화주삼각모식진행재비교,해삼충모식재공구도향、관건제약요소적획득거도、기업가군체、기업목표화생산조직방식방면균존재교대불동。통과구분고화적구역발전모식화동태적구역발전,가이발현구역경제발전시종반수착대고화모식적돌파화보류,모식발원지적경제발전회출현경다적추동。기타지방불능간단투용저삼충발전모식,요근거현실정황조합삼충모식적불동특정이구경호발전。
The paper recompares three typical regional development model born in the rural industrialization of eastern china, namely Sunan model, Wenzhou model and Pearl River Delta （PRD） model. Within the framework of development economics, we point out that the three model differ on the supply and demand-oriented, restricted factor organization. By distinct the curing development assessment, entrepreneurs, goals and production model and dynamic regional economic development, cradles of the models are toward to a convergence development. Elsewhere can not apply the three development models directly, but do a combination based on the developmentenvironment