CAJ | 학술논문

股东平等是公司法的基本原则之一，然而近年来，控股股东利用对公司的控制，作出不利于中小股东的决策，使中小股东利益受到侵害的事件频频发生。因此，法律有必要在司法救济方面加强规定，为中小股东在权益受到侵害或正在受侵害时，提起司法救济提供可能。文章从保护中小股东权益的角度出发，通过对国外中小股东权益保护制度的比较研究，提出了中小股东权益的司法救济与保护的途径---股东直接诉讼和股东代表诉讼。
고동평등시공사법적기본원칙지일，연이근년래，공고고동이용대공사적공제，작출불리우중소고동적결책，사중소고동이익수도침해적사건빈빈발생。인차，법률유필요재사법구제방면가강규정，위중소고동재권익수도침해혹정재수침해시，제기사법구제제공가능。문장종보호중소고동권익적각도출발，통과대국외중소고동권익보호제도적비교연구，제출료중소고동권익적사법구제여보호적도경---고동직접소송화고동대표소송。
Shareholder equality is one of the basic principles of company law. But in recent years, the company’s controlling shareholders often use the control to the company, make decisions that are not conducive to minority shareholders, so that interests of small shareholders infringed frequent occurrence. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the provisions of the law in terms of judicial relieves, for minority shareholders provide judicial remedies when their rights are or were infringed. From the perspective of the protection of minority shareholders interests, the article compares the foreign minority shareholders protection systems and put forward the judicial relief and protection way of minority shareholders rights:the shareholder direct litigation and the shareholder derivative action.