西部中医药
西部中醫藥
서부중의약
GANSU JOURNAL OF TRADITIONAL CHINESE MEDICINE
2014年
1期
121-123
,共3页
颈椎病,神经根型%针灸%理疗%血塞通注射粉针剂%乙酰谷酰胺注射液
頸椎病,神經根型%針灸%理療%血塞通註射粉針劑%乙酰穀酰胺註射液
경추병,신경근형%침구%리료%혈새통주사분침제%을선곡선알주사액
cervical spondylotic radiculopathy%acupuncture%physical therapy%XueSaiTong powder injection%acetylglutamide injection
目的：观察分步针灸合并理疗加血塞通等针剂静脉输注(即针药并用)治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床疗效。方法：将神经根型颈椎病患者90例根据随机数字表法分为治疗组和对照组各45例，对照组给予单纯血塞通等静脉输注治疗，治疗组给予针灸合并理疗加血塞通等静脉输注治疗，10天后比较2组临床疗效。结果：总有效率对照组为82.2%，治疗组为97.8%，2组比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)；2组患者治疗前后血、尿、大便常规及血沉、心电图、肝功能、肾功能等均无显著变化，未发现明显不良反应。结论：分步针药理疗并用治疗神经根型颈椎病疗效优于单纯血塞通注射粉针等静脉输注治疗，且无明显不良反应。
目的：觀察分步針灸閤併理療加血塞通等針劑靜脈輸註(即針藥併用)治療神經根型頸椎病的臨床療效。方法：將神經根型頸椎病患者90例根據隨機數字錶法分為治療組和對照組各45例，對照組給予單純血塞通等靜脈輸註治療，治療組給予針灸閤併理療加血塞通等靜脈輸註治療，10天後比較2組臨床療效。結果：總有效率對照組為82.2%，治療組為97.8%，2組比較差異有統計學意義(P＜0.05)；2組患者治療前後血、尿、大便常規及血沉、心電圖、肝功能、腎功能等均無顯著變化，未髮現明顯不良反應。結論：分步針藥理療併用治療神經根型頸椎病療效優于單純血塞通註射粉針等靜脈輸註治療，且無明顯不良反應。
목적：관찰분보침구합병리료가혈새통등침제정맥수주(즉침약병용)치료신경근형경추병적림상료효。방법：장신경근형경추병환자90례근거수궤수자표법분위치료조화대조조각45례，대조조급여단순혈새통등정맥수주치료，치료조급여침구합병리료가혈새통등정맥수주치료，10천후비교2조림상료효。결과：총유효솔대조조위82.2%，치료조위97.8%，2조비교차이유통계학의의(P＜0.05)；2조환자치료전후혈、뇨、대편상규급혈침、심전도、간공능、신공능등균무현저변화，미발현명현불량반응。결론：분보침약리료병용치료신경근형경추병료효우우단순혈새통주사분침등정맥수주치료，차무명현불량반응。
Objective:To observe clinical effects of acupuncture step by step, physical therapy and intra-venous dripping of XueSaiTong in treating cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR). Methods:All 90 patients were allocated to the treatment group and the control group with random number table method. The control group re-ceived intravenous infusion of XueSaiTong, and the treatment group acupuncture, physical therapy and intravenous dripping of XueSaiTong. Clinical effects were compared in ten days. Results:Total effective rate of the control group was 82.2%, lower than 97.8% of the treatment group, the difference had statistical meaning between both groups (P<0.05);there was no significant difference in blood, urine and stool routine examination, erythrocyte sedimenta-tion rate (ESR), ECG, liver function and renal function between both groups before and after treating, no obvious ad-verse reaction was found. Conclusion:The combination of acupuncture step by step, drugs and physical therapy in treating CSR are superior to only intravenous infusion of XueSaiTong without obvious adverse reaction.
