环境科学导刊
環境科學導刊
배경과학도간
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE SURVEY
2014年
3期
67-69,82
,共4页
祝义平%曾容%唐东民%梁赟
祝義平%曾容%唐東民%樑赟
축의평%증용%당동민%량빈
空气质量%变化%趋势%污染指数%眉山
空氣質量%變化%趨勢%汙染指數%眉山
공기질량%변화%추세%오염지수%미산
air quality%change%trend%pollution index%Meishan
根据眉山市2006-2012年空气质量数据,采用综合污染指数法对SO2、NO2、PM10进行评价。结果表明:各污染物季节变化明显,冬季污染最严重;7年年际变化中,SO2浓度先上升后下降, NO2浓度总体呈上升趋势,PM10浓度明显下降;2012年全市主要污染物污染负荷系数从大到小排列顺序为:PM10(0.39)>SO2(0.32)>NO2(0.29);综合污染指数表明眉山市空气质量属于轻污染。
根據眉山市2006-2012年空氣質量數據,採用綜閤汙染指數法對SO2、NO2、PM10進行評價。結果錶明:各汙染物季節變化明顯,鼕季汙染最嚴重;7年年際變化中,SO2濃度先上升後下降, NO2濃度總體呈上升趨勢,PM10濃度明顯下降;2012年全市主要汙染物汙染負荷繫數從大到小排列順序為:PM10(0.39)>SO2(0.32)>NO2(0.29);綜閤汙染指數錶明眉山市空氣質量屬于輕汙染。
근거미산시2006-2012년공기질량수거,채용종합오염지수법대SO2、NO2、PM10진행평개。결과표명:각오염물계절변화명현,동계오염최엄중;7년년제변화중,SO2농도선상승후하강, NO2농도총체정상승추세,PM10농도명현하강;2012년전시주요오염물오염부하계수종대도소배렬순서위:PM10(0.39)>SO2(0.32)>NO2(0.29);종합오염지수표명미산시공기질량속우경오염。
The comprehensive pollution index was used to assess the concentrations of SO2 ,NO2 ,and PM10 based on the air quality data of 2006 to 2012.The results showed that obvious differences of these pollutants were found between seasons.The winter suffered the most serious pollution.During the study period,the concentration of SO2 was increasing first.Then it was falling down.However,the concentration of NO2 presented a rising trend.PM10 showed a decreasing trend.The comprehensive pollution index of these pollutants ranked as PM10 (0.39)>SO2 (0.32)>NO2 (0.29).The index indicated a light air pollution status in Meishan city.