国际麻醉学与复苏杂志
國際痳醉學與複囌雜誌
국제마취학여복소잡지
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY AND RESUSCITATION
2013年
8期
677-679
,共3页
孔令锁%王冠军%方云%赵侠%陈兰仁
孔令鎖%王冠軍%方雲%趙俠%陳蘭仁
공령쇄%왕관군%방운%조협%진란인
全身麻醉%术后认知恢复%七氟烷%瑞芬太尼%舒芬太尼
全身痳醉%術後認知恢複%七氟烷%瑞芬太尼%舒芬太尼
전신마취%술후인지회복%칠불완%서분태니%서분태니
General anesthesia%Postoperative cognitive recovery%Sevoflurane%Remifentanil%Sufentanil
目的 比较七氟烷复合瑞芬太尼或舒芬太尼对全麻患者术后早期认知功能恢复的影响. 方法 择期行上腹部手术患者60例,年龄60岁~75岁,体重49 kg~80 kg,美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级Ⅰ~Ⅱ级,采用完全随机分组法分为瑞芬太尼七氟烷组(R组)和舒芬太尼七氟烷组(S组),每组30例.麻醉诱导以持续吸入3%~5%七氟烷,依次静注瑞芬太尼1.0 μg/kg或舒芬太尼0.3 μg/kg、罗库溴铵0.9 mg/kg,脑电双频指数(bispectral index,BIS)值≤60维持5s后行气管插管.麻醉维持采用吸入七氟烷,小剂量输注瑞芬太尼或舒芬太尼维持平均动脉压(mean artery pressure,MAP)在基础值20%的范围内.于麻醉前(T0)和拔管后1(T1)、3(T2)、6(T3)、24 h(T4)采用短期方向记忆注意力试验(the short orientation memory concentration test,SOMCT)和改良的瑞秋洛斯阿米哥斯量表(rancho los amigos scale,RLAS)双盲法评估患者认知功能. 结果 两组SOMCT评分和RLAS评估基础值比较差异无统计学意义,T1和T2时点R组SOMCT评分明显高于S组(P<0.05);RLAS评估Ⅷ级T1时点R组23例(77%)、S组8例(27%)(P<0.05),T2时点R组28例(93%)、S组15例(50%)(P<0.05),T3时点R组30例(100%)、S组28例(93%)(P>0.05);T4时点两组患者认知功能均回到术前水平. 结论 上腹部手术七氟烷复合瑞芬太尼或舒芬太尼麻醉患者术后早期皆可出现短暂的认知功能下降,但R组术后早期认知功能恢复较快.
目的 比較七氟烷複閤瑞芬太尼或舒芬太尼對全痳患者術後早期認知功能恢複的影響. 方法 擇期行上腹部手術患者60例,年齡60歲~75歲,體重49 kg~80 kg,美國痳醉醫師協會(ASA)分級Ⅰ~Ⅱ級,採用完全隨機分組法分為瑞芬太尼七氟烷組(R組)和舒芬太尼七氟烷組(S組),每組30例.痳醉誘導以持續吸入3%~5%七氟烷,依次靜註瑞芬太尼1.0 μg/kg或舒芬太尼0.3 μg/kg、囉庫溴銨0.9 mg/kg,腦電雙頻指數(bispectral index,BIS)值≤60維持5s後行氣管插管.痳醉維持採用吸入七氟烷,小劑量輸註瑞芬太尼或舒芬太尼維持平均動脈壓(mean artery pressure,MAP)在基礎值20%的範圍內.于痳醉前(T0)和拔管後1(T1)、3(T2)、6(T3)、24 h(T4)採用短期方嚮記憶註意力試驗(the short orientation memory concentration test,SOMCT)和改良的瑞鞦洛斯阿米哥斯量錶(rancho los amigos scale,RLAS)雙盲法評估患者認知功能. 結果 兩組SOMCT評分和RLAS評估基礎值比較差異無統計學意義,T1和T2時點R組SOMCT評分明顯高于S組(P<0.05);RLAS評估Ⅷ級T1時點R組23例(77%)、S組8例(27%)(P<0.05),T2時點R組28例(93%)、S組15例(50%)(P<0.05),T3時點R組30例(100%)、S組28例(93%)(P>0.05);T4時點兩組患者認知功能均迴到術前水平. 結論 上腹部手術七氟烷複閤瑞芬太尼或舒芬太尼痳醉患者術後早期皆可齣現短暫的認知功能下降,但R組術後早期認知功能恢複較快.
목적 비교칠불완복합서분태니혹서분태니대전마환자술후조기인지공능회복적영향. 방법 택기행상복부수술환자60례,년령60세~75세,체중49 kg~80 kg,미국마취의사협회(ASA)분급Ⅰ~Ⅱ급,채용완전수궤분조법분위서분태니칠불완조(R조)화서분태니칠불완조(S조),매조30례.마취유도이지속흡입3%~5%칠불완,의차정주서분태니1.0 μg/kg혹서분태니0.3 μg/kg、라고추안0.9 mg/kg,뇌전쌍빈지수(bispectral index,BIS)치≤60유지5s후행기관삽관.마취유지채용흡입칠불완,소제량수주서분태니혹서분태니유지평균동맥압(mean artery pressure,MAP)재기출치20%적범위내.우마취전(T0)화발관후1(T1)、3(T2)、6(T3)、24 h(T4)채용단기방향기억주의력시험(the short orientation memory concentration test,SOMCT)화개량적서추락사아미가사량표(rancho los amigos scale,RLAS)쌍맹법평고환자인지공능. 결과 량조SOMCT평분화RLAS평고기출치비교차이무통계학의의,T1화T2시점R조SOMCT평분명현고우S조(P<0.05);RLAS평고Ⅷ급T1시점R조23례(77%)、S조8례(27%)(P<0.05),T2시점R조28례(93%)、S조15례(50%)(P<0.05),T3시점R조30례(100%)、S조28례(93%)(P>0.05);T4시점량조환자인지공능균회도술전수평. 결론 상복부수술칠불완복합서분태니혹서분태니마취환자술후조기개가출현단잠적인지공능하강,단R조술후조기인지공능회복교쾌.
Objective To explore the effects of remifentanil-sevoflurane and sufentanil-sevoflurane for general anesthesia on the early recovery of cognitive function in elderly patients postoperative period.Methods Sixty ASA physical Status Ⅰ-Ⅱ patients (aged 60 y-75 y) were randomly assigned to one of two study groups:anesthesia with remifentanil-sevoflurane (R group) and sufentanil-sevoflurane (S group).Induction of anesthesia was performed by administering sevoflurane constantly.Anaesthesia was induced either with remifentanil (1 μg/kg) or sufentanil (0.3 μg/kg) infusion,after loss of consciousness,rocuronium (0.9 mg/kg) was administered to facilitate endotracheal intubation.Remifentanil and sufentanil were subsequently titrated to lower doses according to the clinical need defined as the minimal dose required formaintaining MAP within 20% of baseline.Sevoflurane was administered at the discretion of the anaesthesiologist to keep the bispectral index (BIS) between 40 and 50.To evaluate cognitive function the Short Orientation Memory Concentration Test(SOMCT) and Rancho Los Amigos Scale(RLAS) were administered to all patients in a double-blind procedure before surgery and at 1,3,6 h and 24 h after extubation (T0,T1,T2,T3,T4).Results There was no significant differences in SOMCT scores and RLAS GradeⅧ at baseline in the two groups.SOMCT scores were significantly reduced in both groups at T1 and recovered to the preoperative level at T2 in R group,but at T3 in S group (P<0.05).RLAS GradeⅧ were significantly reduced in both groups,at T1 23 patients(77%) in R group and 8 patients (27%) in the S group (P<0.05),whereas at T2 28 patients (93%) in R group and 15 patients (50%) in the S group(P<0.05).At T3 and T4 after extubation the RLAS Grade was (aim)ilar in the two groups.Conclusions These preliminary data show remifentanil-sevoflurane and sufentanil-sevoflurane can induce similar intraoperative haemodynamics and extubation time,though the early cognitive recovery is faster after use of remifentanil-sevoflurane than that of sufentanil-sevoflurane.