大家健康(中旬版)
大傢健康(中旬版)
대가건강(중순판)
GOOD HEALTH FOR ALL
2014年
2期
6-6,9
,共2页
药物%体外起搏方法%心律失常%疗效观察
藥物%體外起搏方法%心律失常%療效觀察
약물%체외기박방법%심률실상%료효관찰
drugs%in vitro method of pacing%arrhythmia%curative effect observation
目的:研究采用药物联合体外起搏方法在急诊严重缓慢心律失常的临床疗效观察。方法:选取本中心自2012年1月~2013年4月进行严重缓慢心律失常120例患者进行治疗,对其进行随机分组,分为对照组和观察组,每组60例患者,对照组采用药物治疗,观察组采用药物联合体外起搏对患者进行治疗,对比分析两组的治疗效果。结果:经过本中心分组治疗之后,对照组起搏成功有20例,起搏有效占14例,无效占26例,起搏成功率为56.67%;观察组起搏成功有38例,起搏有效占16例,无效占6例,起搏成功率为90%,两组患者的起搏成功率存在着显著性差异,P<0.05,有统计学意义。结论:采用药物联合体外起搏方法比单纯的药物在严重缓慢心律失常治疗效果更好,其治疗不仅稳定,而且无创,并发症也相对较少,值得临床的应用以及推广。
目的:研究採用藥物聯閤體外起搏方法在急診嚴重緩慢心律失常的臨床療效觀察。方法:選取本中心自2012年1月~2013年4月進行嚴重緩慢心律失常120例患者進行治療,對其進行隨機分組,分為對照組和觀察組,每組60例患者,對照組採用藥物治療,觀察組採用藥物聯閤體外起搏對患者進行治療,對比分析兩組的治療效果。結果:經過本中心分組治療之後,對照組起搏成功有20例,起搏有效佔14例,無效佔26例,起搏成功率為56.67%;觀察組起搏成功有38例,起搏有效佔16例,無效佔6例,起搏成功率為90%,兩組患者的起搏成功率存在著顯著性差異,P<0.05,有統計學意義。結論:採用藥物聯閤體外起搏方法比單純的藥物在嚴重緩慢心律失常治療效果更好,其治療不僅穩定,而且無創,併髮癥也相對較少,值得臨床的應用以及推廣。
목적:연구채용약물연합체외기박방법재급진엄중완만심률실상적림상료효관찰。방법:선취본중심자2012년1월~2013년4월진행엄중완만심률실상120례환자진행치료,대기진행수궤분조,분위대조조화관찰조,매조60례환자,대조조채용약물치료,관찰조채용약물연합체외기박대환자진행치료,대비분석량조적치료효과。결과:경과본중심분조치료지후,대조조기박성공유20례,기박유효점14례,무효점26례,기박성공솔위56.67%;관찰조기박성공유38례,기박유효점16례,무효점6례,기박성공솔위90%,량조환자적기박성공솔존재착현저성차이,P<0.05,유통계학의의。결론:채용약물연합체외기박방법비단순적약물재엄중완만심률실상치료효과경호,기치료불부은정,이차무창,병발증야상대교소,치득림상적응용이급추엄。
Objective :To observe the clinical effect of the drug combination in vitro method of pacing in the emergency of severe bradyarrhythmia . Methods :the center for severe slow arrhythmia in 120 patients who were treated from 2012 January~2013 year in April ,were randomly assigned to it , divided into control group and observation group ,60 patients in each group ,the control group with drug treatment ,observation group used drugs combined with external pacing to treat patients ,comparative analysis of two groups effect of treatment .Results:after the treatment group ,the control group with 20 cases of successful pacing ,pacing ,effective 14 cases ,invalid 26 cases ,the success rate was 56 .67% in observation group pacing ;pacing was successful in 38 cases ,pacing effectively accounted for 16 cases ,invalid 6 cases ,the success rate was 90% in two patients with pacing ,pacing the success rate had significant differences ,P<0 .05 ,there was statistical significance .Conclusion:the drug combined with external pacing method than simple drug in severe slow cardiac better therapeutic effects in the treatment of arrhythmia ,not only the stability ,but also noninvasive ,relatively few complications ,worthy of clinical application and promotion .