中国医学前沿杂志(电子版)
中國醫學前沿雜誌(電子版)
중국의학전연잡지(전자판)
CHINESE JOURNAL OF THE FRONTIERS OF MEDICAL SCIENCE(ELECTRONIC VERSION)
2014年
4期
84-86
,共3页
欧云崧%贾利猛%王明锋%朱莉丽
歐雲崧%賈利猛%王明鋒%硃莉麗
구운숭%가리맹%왕명봉%주리려
急性重症胰腺炎%生长抑素%乌司他丁
急性重癥胰腺炎%生長抑素%烏司他丁
급성중증이선염%생장억소%오사타정
Acute severe pancreatitis%Somatostatin%Ulinastatin
目的:观察急性重症胰腺炎患者采用生长抑素联合乌司他丁治疗的临床疗效,为临床治疗提供参考。方法将81例急性重症胰腺炎患者随机分为两组,两组患者均予常规治疗合并生长抑素治疗,观察组在此基础上予乌司他丁联合治疗,比较两组患者的临床疗效。结果观察组总有效38例(92.68%),对照组总有效30例(75.00%),观察组总有效率高于对照组(χ2=4.698,P=0.030);观察组腹痛腹胀缓解时间、白细胞计数(WBC)恢复时间、血清淀粉酶(AMS)恢复时间、住院时间均少于对照组(t=3.040、2.202、2.067、2.608,P<0.05或0.01);观察组不良反应发生率为17.07%,对照组为22.50%,两组差异无显著性(χ2=0.376,P=0.539)。结论急性重症胰腺炎患者采用生长抑素联合乌司他丁治疗效果优于单用生长抑素,且起效快。
目的:觀察急性重癥胰腺炎患者採用生長抑素聯閤烏司他丁治療的臨床療效,為臨床治療提供參攷。方法將81例急性重癥胰腺炎患者隨機分為兩組,兩組患者均予常規治療閤併生長抑素治療,觀察組在此基礎上予烏司他丁聯閤治療,比較兩組患者的臨床療效。結果觀察組總有效38例(92.68%),對照組總有效30例(75.00%),觀察組總有效率高于對照組(χ2=4.698,P=0.030);觀察組腹痛腹脹緩解時間、白細胞計數(WBC)恢複時間、血清澱粉酶(AMS)恢複時間、住院時間均少于對照組(t=3.040、2.202、2.067、2.608,P<0.05或0.01);觀察組不良反應髮生率為17.07%,對照組為22.50%,兩組差異無顯著性(χ2=0.376,P=0.539)。結論急性重癥胰腺炎患者採用生長抑素聯閤烏司他丁治療效果優于單用生長抑素,且起效快。
목적:관찰급성중증이선염환자채용생장억소연합오사타정치료적림상료효,위림상치료제공삼고。방법장81례급성중증이선염환자수궤분위량조,량조환자균여상규치료합병생장억소치료,관찰조재차기출상여오사타정연합치료,비교량조환자적림상료효。결과관찰조총유효38례(92.68%),대조조총유효30례(75.00%),관찰조총유효솔고우대조조(χ2=4.698,P=0.030);관찰조복통복창완해시간、백세포계수(WBC)회복시간、혈청정분매(AMS)회복시간、주원시간균소우대조조(t=3.040、2.202、2.067、2.608,P<0.05혹0.01);관찰조불량반응발생솔위17.07%,대조조위22.50%,량조차이무현저성(χ2=0.376,P=0.539)。결론급성중증이선염환자채용생장억소연합오사타정치료효과우우단용생장억소,차기효쾌。
Objective To observe the patients with severe acute pancreatitis with somatostatin combined the clinical curative effect of ulinastatin treatment, provide reference for clinical. Methods 81 patients with acute severe pancreatitis were randomly divided into two groups, two groups of both the conventional medicine combined somatostatin therapy, the observing group on the basis of this to the ulinastatin combined treatment, compared two groups of clinical curative effect. Results The total effective observation group 38 cases (92.68%), 30 cases (75.00%), control group total effective observation group total effective rate was higher than the control group (χ2 = 4.698, P = 4.698). Abdominal pain, abdominal distension relief time observing group, the WBC recovery time, AMS recovery time, hospital stay is less than the control group (t=3.040, 2.202, 2.067, 2.202, P<0.05 or 0.01);Experimental group 17.07%incidence of adverse reactions, the control group was 17.07%, no statistically signiifcant differences between the two groups (χ2=0.376, P=0.376). Conclusion Patients with severe acute pancreatitis with somatostatin combined ulinastatin treatment the curative effect is superior to the use of somatostatin, and take effect quickly.