中国医药指南
中國醫藥指南
중국의약지남
CHINA MEDICINE GUIDE
2013年
27期
22-22,23
,共2页
二甲双胍联合阿托伐他汀%2型糖尿病%动脉粥样硬化
二甲雙胍聯閤阿託伐他汀%2型糖尿病%動脈粥樣硬化
이갑쌍고연합아탁벌타정%2형당뇨병%동맥죽양경화
Metformin atorvastatin%Type 2 diabetes%Atherosclerosis
目的:探究二甲双胍联合阿托伐他汀治疗2型糖尿病动脉粥样硬化患者的效果。方法120例2型糖尿病合并动脉粥样硬化患者分为对照组和观察组,对照组糖尿病患者给予二甲双胍、诺和灵30R降糖,观察组患者在对照组药物治疗的基础上给予二甲双胍和阿托伐他汀联合用药,比较治疗前后两组患者血脂变化及颈动脉粥样硬化内膜中膜厚度变化情况。结果观察组MT由治疗前(1.63±0.15)mm缩小为(1.39±0.22)mm,前后比较差异显著(P<0.05),而对照组治疗前后MT差异不明显(P>0.05)。观察组患者治疗后的TC、TG、LDL指标与治疗前相比均有显著降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);而对照组除LDL指标治疗前后有显著差异(P<0.05)外,其他几项比较均无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论二甲双胍联合阿托伐他汀治疗2型糖尿病动脉粥样硬化比使用二甲双胍和其他将糖类药物在控制血糖缓解动脉粥样硬化方面更具有优势。
目的:探究二甲雙胍聯閤阿託伐他汀治療2型糖尿病動脈粥樣硬化患者的效果。方法120例2型糖尿病閤併動脈粥樣硬化患者分為對照組和觀察組,對照組糖尿病患者給予二甲雙胍、諾和靈30R降糖,觀察組患者在對照組藥物治療的基礎上給予二甲雙胍和阿託伐他汀聯閤用藥,比較治療前後兩組患者血脂變化及頸動脈粥樣硬化內膜中膜厚度變化情況。結果觀察組MT由治療前(1.63±0.15)mm縮小為(1.39±0.22)mm,前後比較差異顯著(P<0.05),而對照組治療前後MT差異不明顯(P>0.05)。觀察組患者治療後的TC、TG、LDL指標與治療前相比均有顯著降低,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);而對照組除LDL指標治療前後有顯著差異(P<0.05)外,其他幾項比較均無顯著差異(P>0.05)。結論二甲雙胍聯閤阿託伐他汀治療2型糖尿病動脈粥樣硬化比使用二甲雙胍和其他將糖類藥物在控製血糖緩解動脈粥樣硬化方麵更具有優勢。
목적:탐구이갑쌍고연합아탁벌타정치료2형당뇨병동맥죽양경화환자적효과。방법120례2형당뇨병합병동맥죽양경화환자분위대조조화관찰조,대조조당뇨병환자급여이갑쌍고、낙화령30R강당,관찰조환자재대조조약물치료적기출상급여이갑쌍고화아탁벌타정연합용약,비교치료전후량조환자혈지변화급경동맥죽양경화내막중막후도변화정황。결과관찰조MT유치료전(1.63±0.15)mm축소위(1.39±0.22)mm,전후비교차이현저(P<0.05),이대조조치료전후MT차이불명현(P>0.05)。관찰조환자치료후적TC、TG、LDL지표여치료전상비균유현저강저,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);이대조조제LDL지표치료전후유현저차이(P<0.05)외,기타궤항비교균무현저차이(P>0.05)。결론이갑쌍고연합아탁벌타정치료2형당뇨병동맥죽양경화비사용이갑쌍고화기타장당류약물재공제혈당완해동맥죽양경화방면경구유우세。
Objective To explore metformin atorvastatin treatment Type 2 diabetes patients with atherosclerosis effect. Methods 120 patients with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerosis patients were divided into control group and observation group and control group were treated with metformin diabetic, hypoglycemic Novolin 30R, observe patients in the control group on the basis of drug treatment given metformin and A ADS atorvastatin combination therapy, compared two groups of patients before and after treatment changes in blood lipids and carotid atherosclerosis intima-media thickness changes. Results The MT by the pre-treatment (1.63 ± 0.15) mm reduced to (1.39 ± 0.22) mm, a signiifcant difference between before and after (P<0.05), while the control group before and after treatment MT signiifcant difference (P>0.05). The patients after treatment TC, TG, LDL indicators compared with before treatment were signiifcantly lower, the difference was statistically signiifcant (P<0.05);while the control group before and after treatment than LDL were signiifcantly different (P<0.05) outside , several other showed no signiifcant difference (P>0.05). Conclusion Metformin atorvastatin treatment Type 2 diabetes atherosclerosis than using metformin and other drugs in the control of blood glucose sugars will ease aspects of atherosclerosis has more advantages.