中国医药指南
中國醫藥指南
중국의약지남
CHINA MEDICINE GUIDE
2013年
29期
428-428,429
,共2页
王海瑞%赵俊亭%刘伟杰%许波
王海瑞%趙俊亭%劉偉傑%許波
왕해서%조준정%류위걸%허파
乳突根治术%耳甲腔成形术%乳突填塞%耳后带蒂肌骨膜瓣
乳突根治術%耳甲腔成形術%乳突填塞%耳後帶蒂肌骨膜瓣
유돌근치술%이갑강성형술%유돌전새%이후대체기골막판
Mastoidectomy%Ear cavity angioplasty%Mastoid tamponade%Ear periosteal flap pedicled muscle
目的:?探讨开放式乳突根治术在耳甲腔成形基础上乳突填塞的疗效。方法选取在2005年2月至2011年10月间在我院的162例(162耳)患者,实验组80例采用开放性乳突根治术+耳甲腔成形及耳后带蒂肌骨膜瓣乳突填塞,对照组82例采用开放性乳突根治术+耳甲腔成形术,术后随访0.5~2年。结果实验组干耳率92.50%明显高于对照组79.27%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=5.820,P=0.016)。实验组术后复发感染率1.25%低于对照组8.54%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.580,P=0.032)。结论在开放式乳突根治术及耳甲腔成形同时,行肌骨膜瓣乳突填塞,不但能扩大外耳道口、缩小根治腔,还能使其与原来的外耳道解剖与功能极为相似,既美观又便于观察。此外,它还促进上皮化及通气引流,提高术后干耳率,从而提高根治术的疗效。
目的:?探討開放式乳突根治術在耳甲腔成形基礎上乳突填塞的療效。方法選取在2005年2月至2011年10月間在我院的162例(162耳)患者,實驗組80例採用開放性乳突根治術+耳甲腔成形及耳後帶蒂肌骨膜瓣乳突填塞,對照組82例採用開放性乳突根治術+耳甲腔成形術,術後隨訪0.5~2年。結果實驗組榦耳率92.50%明顯高于對照組79.27%,差異有統計學意義(χ2=5.820,P=0.016)。實驗組術後複髮感染率1.25%低于對照組8.54%,差異有統計學意義(χ2=4.580,P=0.032)。結論在開放式乳突根治術及耳甲腔成形同時,行肌骨膜瓣乳突填塞,不但能擴大外耳道口、縮小根治腔,還能使其與原來的外耳道解剖與功能極為相似,既美觀又便于觀察。此外,它還促進上皮化及通氣引流,提高術後榦耳率,從而提高根治術的療效。
목적:?탐토개방식유돌근치술재이갑강성형기출상유돌전새적료효。방법선취재2005년2월지2011년10월간재아원적162례(162이)환자,실험조80례채용개방성유돌근치술+이갑강성형급이후대체기골막판유돌전새,대조조82례채용개방성유돌근치술+이갑강성형술,술후수방0.5~2년。결과실험조간이솔92.50%명현고우대조조79.27%,차이유통계학의의(χ2=5.820,P=0.016)。실험조술후복발감염솔1.25%저우대조조8.54%,차이유통계학의의(χ2=4.580,P=0.032)。결론재개방식유돌근치술급이갑강성형동시,행기골막판유돌전새,불단능확대외이도구、축소근치강,환능사기여원래적외이도해부여공능겁위상사,기미관우편우관찰。차외,타환촉진상피화급통기인류,제고술후간이솔,종이제고근치술적료효。
Objective Explore the open mastoid surgery in the ear cavity formed mastoidectomy obliteration on the basis of efficacy. Methods Select from February 2005 to October 2011 in our hospital 162 patients (162 ears) in the experimental group 80 cases of open mastoid radical mastectomy+ear cavity forming ear muscle pedicle periosteal flap mastoid tamponade, control group 82 cases of open mastoid radical mastectomy+ear cavity angioplasty, patients were followed up for 0.5 to 2 years. Results Dry ear rate of the experimental group (92.50%) was significantly higher than that in the control group (79.27%), the difference was statistically significant (χ2=5.820,P=0.016). The recurrence and infection rate of the experimental group (1.25%) was lower than the control group (8.54%), the difference was statistically significant (χ2=4.580,P=0.032). Conclusion Open mastoid surgery and ear cavity forming at the same time, muscle periosteal flap mastoid tamponade, not only to expand the external ear canal, reducing the radical cavity, but also to make it with the original external auditory canal anatomy and function are very similar, both beautiful and easy to observation. It also promotes epithelial ventilation and drainage, postoperative dry ear rate, thereby enhancing the efficacy of radical surgery.