医学信息
醫學信息
의학신식
MEDICAL INFORMATION
2013年
29期
574-574
,共1页
牙槽突裂(alveolar cleft)%植骨术后%局部压迫%止血带
牙槽突裂(alveolar cleft)%植骨術後%跼部壓迫%止血帶
아조돌렬(alveolar cleft)%식골술후%국부압박%지혈대
Alveolar cleft (alveolar cleft)%Bone grafting%Local compression%Tourniquet
目的：探讨牙槽突裂患者取髂骨植骨术后供骨区不同的加压止血方法效果。方法选取我科2012年5月~2013年5月共32例患者随机分为两组，每组16例。观察组用自制弹性局部压迫止血带对供骨区进行加压止血，对照组用传统的腹带加压方式对髂骨供骨区进行加压止血。结果对照组有2例髂骨供骨区腹带出现渗血较多，观察组均未发生渗血。两组患者髂部伤口均甲级愈合。依从性及主观舒适度观察组优于对照组。结论牙槽突裂取髂骨植骨术后，自制弹性局部压迫止血带进行持续加压优于传统腹带加压止血。
目的：探討牙槽突裂患者取髂骨植骨術後供骨區不同的加壓止血方法效果。方法選取我科2012年5月~2013年5月共32例患者隨機分為兩組，每組16例。觀察組用自製彈性跼部壓迫止血帶對供骨區進行加壓止血，對照組用傳統的腹帶加壓方式對髂骨供骨區進行加壓止血。結果對照組有2例髂骨供骨區腹帶齣現滲血較多，觀察組均未髮生滲血。兩組患者髂部傷口均甲級愈閤。依從性及主觀舒適度觀察組優于對照組。結論牙槽突裂取髂骨植骨術後，自製彈性跼部壓迫止血帶進行持續加壓優于傳統腹帶加壓止血。
목적：탐토아조돌렬환자취가골식골술후공골구불동적가압지혈방법효과。방법선취아과2012년5월~2013년5월공32례환자수궤분위량조，매조16례。관찰조용자제탄성국부압박지혈대대공골구진행가압지혈，대조조용전통적복대가압방식대가골공골구진행가압지혈。결과대조조유2례가골공골구복대출현삼혈교다，관찰조균미발생삼혈。량조환자가부상구균갑급유합。의종성급주관서괄도관찰조우우대조조。결론아조돌렬취가골식골술후，자제탄성국부압박지혈대진행지속가압우우전통복대가압지혈。
Objective:To investigate the alveolar cleft bone for compression hemostasis method ef ect of dif erent patients iliac bone grafting surgery. Methods:selected in our department from 2012 May to 2013 May a total of 32 patients were randomly divided into two groups, 16 patients in each group. The observation group with self made elastic local compression tourniquet on donor bone region compression hemostasis, the control group with traditional compression methods on the donor site of compression hemostasis. Results: in the control group, 2 cases of donor site abdominal leak blood more, the observation group were not have ooze blood. Two groups of patients with iliac wounds were healed. Compliance and subjective comfort observation group than the control group. Conclusion: the alveolar cleft bone grafting surgery, self made elastic local compression tourniquet for continuous pressure is superior to the traditional compression hemostasis.
