CAJ | 학술논문

目的通过对离心静脉穿刺与向心静脉穿刺两种不同穿刺法的比较，探讨离心静脉穿刺静脉输液的可行性。方法将2013年1月~12月，输液患者随机分为实验组及对照组，其中实验组采用离心方向穿刺静脉输液法，对照组采用向心方向穿刺静脉输液法。结果离心穿刺法成功率98.3%，而向心穿刺法成功率85.8%，两者比较有非常显著性差异(<0.01)，两种穿刺方法的液体流速无显著性差异(>0.05)，渗漏发生率比较有显著性差异(<0.01)，手活动度比较有显著性差异(<0.01)，静脉炎发生率比较有显著性差异(<0.01)。结论采用离心静脉穿刺方法穿刺成功率高，减少患者痛苦及静脉输液并发症的发生。
목적통과대리심정맥천자여향심정맥천자량충불동천자법적비교，탐토리심정맥천자정맥수액적가행성。방법장2013년1월~12월，수액환자수궤분위실험조급대조조，기중실험조채용리심방향천자정맥수액법，대조조채용향심방향천자정맥수액법。결과리심천자법성공솔98.3%，이향심천자법성공솔85.8%，량자비교유비상현저성차이(<0.01)，량충천자방법적액체류속무현저성차이(>0.05)，삼루발생솔비교유현저성차이(<0.01)，수활동도비교유현저성차이(<0.01)，정맥염발생솔비교유현저성차이(<0.01)。결론채용리심정맥천자방법천자성공솔고，감소환자통고급정맥수액병발증적발생。
Objective Through the comparison of the centrifugal and centripetalpuncture vein puncture in two dif erent puncture, feasibility study of centrifugalvenipuncture intravenous infusion. Methods The 2013 January to 2013 December,infusion were randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group, the experimental group using centrifugal direction of puncture vein infusion, the control group using centripetal puncture vein infusion. Results Centrifugal puncture success rate of 98.3%, while centripetal puncture success rate of 85.8%, compared with a very significant dif erence ( <0.01), there was no significant dif erence between the two puncture methods of liquid flow rate ( >0.05), leakage rate were significant dif erence( <0.01), a hand job mobility had significant dif erence ( <0.01), the incidence of phlebitis were significantly dif erent ( <0.01). Conclusion The high success rate of puncture using centrifugal vein puncture method clinical nursing problems, reduce thepain of patients and intravenous infusion.