当代医学
噹代醫學
당대의학
CHINA CONTEMPORARY MEDICINE
2013年
30期
46-46,47
,共2页
刘金全%童志明%陈敏%黄国华
劉金全%童誌明%陳敏%黃國華
류금전%동지명%진민%황국화
DR%CT%腰椎退行性变
DR%CT%腰椎退行性變
DR%CT%요추퇴행성변
DR%CT%Lumbar degeneration
目的:研究DR和CT对老年人腰椎退行性病变的临床诊断价值。方法选择2011年3月-2013年3月治的480例患者进行研究。按照随机数表法,随机分别为DR组和CT组,每组各240例患者。分别采用DR、CT对两组患者进行诊断,并对两组患者诊断的影像学特点和准确率进行比较分析。结果480例患者共有270例患者出现老年腰椎间盘突出,在小关节处均出现不同程度退变现象。其中DR组患者的误诊、漏诊共有9例,而CT组没有出现误诊、漏诊;CT组对于各类老年腰椎退行性病变的临床诊断效果明显优于DR组(P<0.05)。CT组诊断的确诊率明显高于DR组(P<0.05);CT组诊断的误诊率和漏诊率(0)均明显低于DR组(2.08%,1.67%),两组比较有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论应用CT扫描的方法诊断老年腰椎退行性变更清晰准确,效果优于DR。
目的:研究DR和CT對老年人腰椎退行性病變的臨床診斷價值。方法選擇2011年3月-2013年3月治的480例患者進行研究。按照隨機數錶法,隨機分彆為DR組和CT組,每組各240例患者。分彆採用DR、CT對兩組患者進行診斷,併對兩組患者診斷的影像學特點和準確率進行比較分析。結果480例患者共有270例患者齣現老年腰椎間盤突齣,在小關節處均齣現不同程度退變現象。其中DR組患者的誤診、漏診共有9例,而CT組沒有齣現誤診、漏診;CT組對于各類老年腰椎退行性病變的臨床診斷效果明顯優于DR組(P<0.05)。CT組診斷的確診率明顯高于DR組(P<0.05);CT組診斷的誤診率和漏診率(0)均明顯低于DR組(2.08%,1.67%),兩組比較有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論應用CT掃描的方法診斷老年腰椎退行性變更清晰準確,效果優于DR。
목적:연구DR화CT대노년인요추퇴행성병변적림상진단개치。방법선택2011년3월-2013년3월치적480례환자진행연구。안조수궤수표법,수궤분별위DR조화CT조,매조각240례환자。분별채용DR、CT대량조환자진행진단,병대량조환자진단적영상학특점화준학솔진행비교분석。결과480례환자공유270례환자출현노년요추간반돌출,재소관절처균출현불동정도퇴변현상。기중DR조환자적오진、루진공유9례,이CT조몰유출현오진、루진;CT조대우각류노년요추퇴행성병변적림상진단효과명현우우DR조(P<0.05)。CT조진단적학진솔명현고우DR조(P<0.05);CT조진단적오진솔화루진솔(0)균명현저우DR조(2.08%,1.67%),량조비교유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론응용CT소묘적방법진단노년요추퇴행성변경청석준학,효과우우DR。
Objective To study the diagnostic value of DR and CT in the elderly lumbar degenerative disease . Methods 480 patients from March 2011 to March 2013 were studied and were divided into to DR group and CT group in according with the table of random numbers, 240 in each patients. The two groups were diagnosed with DR and CT respectively. The imaging features and the accuracy rate of diagnosis were compared. Results 270 patients were elderly lumbar disc, there are different degrees of degeneration in the small joints. There were 9 cases in DR group with misdiagnosis, and there was no misdiagnosis in . the imaging features of advantage of the CT group better than the DR group The assurance of diagnosis in CT group for all types of elderly patients with lumbar degenerative disease is better than the DR group, the data was statistically signiifcant (P<0.05). Diagnosis rate of the CT group was signiifcantly higher than the DR group (P<0.05);misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis rate of the CT group (0.0%) were signiifcantly lower than the DR group (2.08%, 1.67%), the differences was statistically signiifcant (P<0.05). Conclusion It is clear and accuracy that CT was used in the diagnosis for the elderly lumbar degenerative.It is better than DR.