中国电机工程学报
中國電機工程學報
중국전궤공정학보
ZHONGGUO DIANJI GONGCHENG XUEBAO
2013年
31期
99-105
,共7页
马超%肖先勇%李长松%杨景岗
馬超%肖先勇%李長鬆%楊景崗
마초%초선용%리장송%양경강
连锁性故障%事故识别%风险测度%模糊性%可信性
連鎖性故障%事故識彆%風險測度%模糊性%可信性
련쇄성고장%사고식별%풍험측도%모호성%가신성
cascading failure%contingency identification%risk measure%fuzziness%credibility
电网连锁性故障常为稀有事件,传统随机评估法用概率测度刻画其不确定性,存在仿真精度与抽样次数间的矛盾。基于模糊性与随机性的统一性原则,用模糊性刻画连锁性故障的不确定性,并依据可信性理论,建立包含可信性测度、总负荷损失和风险测度的连锁性故障风险评价测度体系。用保护装置隐性故障模型刻画连锁性故障诱发机制,基于历史统计信息或人工预想事故集,提出电网连锁性故障识别和风险评估基本框架与数学模型。对 WSCC 9节点和IEEE 30节点测试系统进行仿真,并与随机评估法比较,结果证明,所提方法准确、有效,样本依赖性小,有较好的鲁棒性,适合于工程应用。
電網連鎖性故障常為稀有事件,傳統隨機評估法用概率測度刻畫其不確定性,存在倣真精度與抽樣次數間的矛盾。基于模糊性與隨機性的統一性原則,用模糊性刻畫連鎖性故障的不確定性,併依據可信性理論,建立包含可信性測度、總負荷損失和風險測度的連鎖性故障風險評價測度體繫。用保護裝置隱性故障模型刻畫連鎖性故障誘髮機製,基于歷史統計信息或人工預想事故集,提齣電網連鎖性故障識彆和風險評估基本框架與數學模型。對 WSCC 9節點和IEEE 30節點測試繫統進行倣真,併與隨機評估法比較,結果證明,所提方法準確、有效,樣本依賴性小,有較好的魯棒性,適閤于工程應用。
전망련쇄성고장상위희유사건,전통수궤평고법용개솔측도각화기불학정성,존재방진정도여추양차수간적모순。기우모호성여수궤성적통일성원칙,용모호성각화련쇄성고장적불학정성,병의거가신성이론,건립포함가신성측도、총부하손실화풍험측도적련쇄성고장풍험평개측도체계。용보호장치은성고장모형각화련쇄성고장유발궤제,기우역사통계신식혹인공예상사고집,제출전망련쇄성고장식별화풍험평고기본광가여수학모형。대 WSCC 9절점화IEEE 30절점측시계통진행방진,병여수궤평고법비교,결과증명,소제방법준학、유효,양본의뢰성소,유교호적로봉성,괄합우공정응용。
The current stochastic assessment method usually adopts the probability measure to quantify the uncertainty of cascading failures. There is a contradiction between simulation precise and samplings because of the rarity of cascading failures. The cascading failure event was treated as a fuzzy one based on the united principle of fuzziness and randomness in this paper. The risk evaluation measure system, including the credibility measure, total load loss and risk measure, was introduced based on the credibility theory. The hidden failure model of protection systems was taken as the propagation mechanism of cascading failures, and then the basic framework and mathematical model of identification and risk assessment of cascading failures were proposed through historical statistical information or artificial contingency sets. On the simulation of the WSCC nine-bus and IEEE thirty-bus test system, compared with the stochastic assessment method, the results have shown that the proposed method is accurate, valid, little dependent on samplings and robust, and it is suitable for practical engineering applications.