医学研究与教育
醫學研究與教育
의학연구여교육
MEDICAL RESEARCH AND EDUCATION
2013年
5期
32-34,45
,共4页
王建国%王淑仙%梁淑新%李铁民
王建國%王淑仙%樑淑新%李鐵民
왕건국%왕숙선%량숙신%리철민
胱抑素C%同型半胱氨酸%糖尿病肾病
胱抑素C%同型半胱氨痠%糖尿病腎病
광억소C%동형반광안산%당뇨병신병
cystatin C%homocysteine%diabetic nephropathy
目的:探讨胱抑素C(CysC)和同型半胱氨酸(Hcy)联合检测在糖尿病肾病(DN)中的临床应用价值。方法根据24尿白蛋白排泄率将142例糖尿病(DM)患者分为单纯糖尿病组(SDM组)、早期糖尿病肾病组(EDN组)、临床糖尿病肾病组(CDN组),分别检测各组患者血清中CysC和Hcy。结果 CysC浓度在4组之间经方差分析,其差异具有统计学意义(F=180.273,P<0.05);Hcy浓度在4组之间经方差分析,其差异具有统计学意义(F=117.064,P<0.05)。CysC和Hcy的浓度在SDM组与正常对照组(NC组)之间进行两两比较时,经统计学分析其差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);而EDN组和CDN组分别与NC组进行两两比较时,经统计学分析其差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);CysC和Hcy在SDM、EDN、CDN 3组间的浓度呈逐渐增高趋势,且3组之间进行两两比较时,经统计学分析,其差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论CysC和Hcy联合检测可作为DN的早期诊断指标,同时也可作为DN病情的监测指标。
目的:探討胱抑素C(CysC)和同型半胱氨痠(Hcy)聯閤檢測在糖尿病腎病(DN)中的臨床應用價值。方法根據24尿白蛋白排洩率將142例糖尿病(DM)患者分為單純糖尿病組(SDM組)、早期糖尿病腎病組(EDN組)、臨床糖尿病腎病組(CDN組),分彆檢測各組患者血清中CysC和Hcy。結果 CysC濃度在4組之間經方差分析,其差異具有統計學意義(F=180.273,P<0.05);Hcy濃度在4組之間經方差分析,其差異具有統計學意義(F=117.064,P<0.05)。CysC和Hcy的濃度在SDM組與正常對照組(NC組)之間進行兩兩比較時,經統計學分析其差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);而EDN組和CDN組分彆與NC組進行兩兩比較時,經統計學分析其差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05);CysC和Hcy在SDM、EDN、CDN 3組間的濃度呈逐漸增高趨勢,且3組之間進行兩兩比較時,經統計學分析,其差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論CysC和Hcy聯閤檢測可作為DN的早期診斷指標,同時也可作為DN病情的鑑測指標。
목적:탐토광억소C(CysC)화동형반광안산(Hcy)연합검측재당뇨병신병(DN)중적림상응용개치。방법근거24뇨백단백배설솔장142례당뇨병(DM)환자분위단순당뇨병조(SDM조)、조기당뇨병신병조(EDN조)、림상당뇨병신병조(CDN조),분별검측각조환자혈청중CysC화Hcy。결과 CysC농도재4조지간경방차분석,기차이구유통계학의의(F=180.273,P<0.05);Hcy농도재4조지간경방차분석,기차이구유통계학의의(F=117.064,P<0.05)。CysC화Hcy적농도재SDM조여정상대조조(NC조)지간진행량량비교시,경통계학분석기차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);이EDN조화CDN조분별여NC조진행량량비교시,경통계학분석기차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05);CysC화Hcy재SDM、EDN、CDN 3조간적농도정축점증고추세,차3조지간진행량량비교시,경통계학분석,기차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론CysC화Hcy연합검측가작위DN적조기진단지표,동시야가작위DN병정적감측지표。
Objective To study the value of clinical application of detection of serum cystatin C(Cysc), hemocysteine(Hcy) in judgement of renal damage of patients with early diabetic nephropathy(DN). Methods According to 24 h urinary albumin excretion rate(UAER), 142 patients with diabetes mellitus(DM) were divided into three groups, including simple diabetes mellitus(SDM), early diabetic nephropathy(EDN) and clinical diabetic nephropathy(CDN) group. Results There were significant differences among the four groups considering the concentration of CysC and Hcy(F=180.273, P<0.05. F=117.064, P<0.05). There were no signiifcant differences between SDM and NC groups connecting the concentration of CysC and Hcy(P>0.05). There were signiifcant differences between EDN, CDN and NC groups connecting the concentration of CysC and Hcy(P<0.05). There was an increased trend in the concentration of CysC and Hcy in the groups of SDM, EDN and CDN. There were signiifcant differences between the groups (P<0.05). Conclusion The combined detection of CysC and Hcy were sensitve indicators in judgement of early renal damage of DN patients, At the same time, they could be used as a monitoring index in patients with DN.