CAJ | 학술논문

对公司僵局进行司法救济的前提是公司僵局之不可回避、不可自救，由此获得司法干预的法理基础：亟需填补的法律漏洞、公司自力救济不能、其他救济途径用尽，是司法救济的必要性所在；维护股东权利、实现实质正义、满足期待利益，这是司法救济的正当性所在；司法介入应遵循几项基本原则，这是司法救济的适当性所在。同时，思考公司自治与司法介入的关系，希望在对国家强制保持警惕的同时信任司法救济，最终达到平衡各方利益的善果。
대공사강국진행사법구제적전제시공사강국지불가회피、불가자구，유차획득사법간예적법리기출：극수전보적법률루동、공사자력구제불능、기타구제도경용진，시사법구제적필요성소재；유호고동권리、실현실질정의、만족기대이익，저시사법구제적정당성소재；사법개입응준순궤항기본원칙，저시사법구제적괄당성소재。동시，사고공사자치여사법개입적관계，희망재대국가강제보지경척적동시신임사법구제，최종체도평형각방이익적선과。
When the corporate deadlock is inevitable and cannot be helped by itself,the judicial inter-ference appears.The necessity of the judicial remedy is:urgent need to fill the legal loophole,no capabilityto help itself,no alternative means to remedy.The justification is:the protection of the right and benefitsof the shareholders,the access to justice and satisfaction of the interests.The propriety is judicial interfer-ence abiding by several main principles.Judicial intervention should adhere to the basic principle,which iswhere the appropriateness of judicial relief lies.Meanwhile,the relation between corporate autonomy andjudicial intervention should be concerned,hoping to trust the judicial relief at the vigilance on the nationalmandatory,so that to balance the concerned parties’rights and interests.