滨州医学院学报
濱州醫學院學報
빈주의학원학보
JOURNAL OF BINZHOU MEDICAL COLLEGE
2013年
5期
349-352
,共4页
马照%张伟%王晓慧%马金波%臧茹琨%夏玉军
馬照%張偉%王曉慧%馬金波%臧茹琨%夏玉軍
마조%장위%왕효혜%마금파%장여곤%하옥군
乳腺癌%三维适形放疗%调强放射治疗%剂量学
乳腺癌%三維適形放療%調彊放射治療%劑量學
유선암%삼유괄형방료%조강방사치료%제량학
breast cancer%three-dimension conformal radiation therapy%intensity-modulated radiation therapy%dosimetry
目的探讨乳腺癌术胸壁及锁骨上区两种照射模式的剂量学特点,为临床选择提供参考。方法选取10例乳腺癌伴锁骨上区淋巴结转移的患者,分别设计三维适形计划(3DCRT)和混合逆向调强计划(Hy-IMRT),计划靶区(PTV)处方剂量为50 Gy分25次。利用剂量体积直方图( DVH)评价两种计划的靶区剂量、均质性指数( HI)及危及器官( OAR)的受量。结果<br> Hy-IMRT靶区的近似最大剂量D2%分别为明显低于3DCRT(t=-9.821,P<0.05),近似最小剂量D98%明显高于3DCRT计划(t=3.879,P<0.05);混合调强计划靶区剂量均质指数(HI)明显好于3DCRT计划(t=-7.657,P<0.05);靶区平均剂量Dmeam两种计划之间无统计学意义。患侧肺的V20、V30混合逆向调强计划明显低于适形计划( t=-3.401、-4.117, P<0.05),其他危及器官受量无差异。结论胸壁及锁骨上区混合调强技术计划在剂量分布、危及器官保护、HI等方面都好于3DCRT计划。
目的探討乳腺癌術胸壁及鎖骨上區兩種照射模式的劑量學特點,為臨床選擇提供參攷。方法選取10例乳腺癌伴鎖骨上區淋巴結轉移的患者,分彆設計三維適形計劃(3DCRT)和混閤逆嚮調彊計劃(Hy-IMRT),計劃靶區(PTV)處方劑量為50 Gy分25次。利用劑量體積直方圖( DVH)評價兩種計劃的靶區劑量、均質性指數( HI)及危及器官( OAR)的受量。結果<br> Hy-IMRT靶區的近似最大劑量D2%分彆為明顯低于3DCRT(t=-9.821,P<0.05),近似最小劑量D98%明顯高于3DCRT計劃(t=3.879,P<0.05);混閤調彊計劃靶區劑量均質指數(HI)明顯好于3DCRT計劃(t=-7.657,P<0.05);靶區平均劑量Dmeam兩種計劃之間無統計學意義。患側肺的V20、V30混閤逆嚮調彊計劃明顯低于適形計劃( t=-3.401、-4.117, P<0.05),其他危及器官受量無差異。結論胸壁及鎖骨上區混閤調彊技術計劃在劑量分佈、危及器官保護、HI等方麵都好于3DCRT計劃。
목적탐토유선암술흉벽급쇄골상구량충조사모식적제량학특점,위림상선택제공삼고。방법선취10례유선암반쇄골상구림파결전이적환자,분별설계삼유괄형계화(3DCRT)화혼합역향조강계화(Hy-IMRT),계화파구(PTV)처방제량위50 Gy분25차。이용제량체적직방도( DVH)평개량충계화적파구제량、균질성지수( HI)급위급기관( OAR)적수량。결과<br> Hy-IMRT파구적근사최대제량D2%분별위명현저우3DCRT(t=-9.821,P<0.05),근사최소제량D98%명현고우3DCRT계화(t=3.879,P<0.05);혼합조강계화파구제량균질지수(HI)명현호우3DCRT계화(t=-7.657,P<0.05);파구평균제량Dmeam량충계화지간무통계학의의。환측폐적V20、V30혼합역향조강계화명현저우괄형계화( t=-3.401、-4.117, P<0.05),기타위급기관수량무차이。결론흉벽급쇄골상구혼합조강기술계화재제량분포、위급기관보호、HI등방면도호우3DCRT계화。
Objective To evaluate the dosimetric benefits of the hybridintensity modulated radiotherapy ( Hy-IMRT) after breast-conserving surgery.Methods For each of 10 chosen patients with breast cancer ,three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and Hy-IMRT were designed.The prescribed dose for planning target volume (PTV) was 50 Gy/25f.Dosimetric comparisons of PTV dose distribution,homogeneity index (HI) and dose of organs at risk(OAR) between the two plans were performed on each patient by dose volume histogram (DVH).Results The D2%of Hy-IMRT was statistically lower than that of 3DCRT(t=-9.821,P<0.05), and the D98%was statistically higher than that of 3DCRT(t=3.879,P<0.05);The HI of Hy-IMRT was statistically lower than that of 3DCRT(t=-7.657,P<0.05);There was no signifeicant difference in the mean dose (Dmean ) between the two plans.The lung (V20、V30) in Hy-IMRT paln was lower than 3DCRT plan(t=-3.401、-4.117,P<0.05).There was no statistical difference of ex-posure dose to other OARs between the two plans .Conclusion Hy-IMRT can improve target dose uniformity ,HI and protect the organs at risk well compared to the 3DCRT in patients with breast cancer after the breast-conserving surgery .