浙江临床医学
浙江臨床醫學
절강림상의학
ZHEJIANG CLINICAL MEDICAL JOURNAL
2013年
10期
1480-1481,1482
,共3页
高血压急症%佩尔地平%硝酸甘油
高血壓急癥%珮爾地平%硝痠甘油
고혈압급증%패이지평%초산감유
Hypertensive emergencies%Nicardipine%Nitroglycerin
目的:比较佩尔地平与硝酸甘油用输液泵输注治疗高血压急症疗效及安全性。方法120例高血压急症患者随机分为佩尔地平组和硝酸甘油组,各60例。两组患者均使用微量泵静脉输注降压药。佩尔地平组:20mg佩尔地平稀释于生理盐水至50ml,起始剂量4ml/h。硝酸甘油组:50mg硝酸甘油稀释于生理盐水至50ml,起始剂量3ml/h。观察并记录两组患者用药前、用药5、10、30、60min后的血压、心率,据此调整药液泵入速度。比较两组患者用药后起效时间,用药60min后降压有效率及心率变化。结果佩尔地平较硝酸甘油起效快,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。用药60 min后,佩尔地平组全部患者血压降至目标值,硝酸甘油组48例患者血压降至目标值,降压有效率分别为100%和80%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。用药后两组患者心率均有增加,但佩尔地平组心率在30min时开始逐渐恢复,用药后60min后心率与用药前相比差异无统计学意义,硝酸甘油组用药后60 min心率尚未恢复至用药前水平,与用药前相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论佩尔地平输液泵输注治疗高血压急症起效迅速、降压平稳、疗效确切,且对心率的影响较小,为急诊科治疗高血压急症的理想药物。
目的:比較珮爾地平與硝痠甘油用輸液泵輸註治療高血壓急癥療效及安全性。方法120例高血壓急癥患者隨機分為珮爾地平組和硝痠甘油組,各60例。兩組患者均使用微量泵靜脈輸註降壓藥。珮爾地平組:20mg珮爾地平稀釋于生理鹽水至50ml,起始劑量4ml/h。硝痠甘油組:50mg硝痠甘油稀釋于生理鹽水至50ml,起始劑量3ml/h。觀察併記錄兩組患者用藥前、用藥5、10、30、60min後的血壓、心率,據此調整藥液泵入速度。比較兩組患者用藥後起效時間,用藥60min後降壓有效率及心率變化。結果珮爾地平較硝痠甘油起效快,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。用藥60 min後,珮爾地平組全部患者血壓降至目標值,硝痠甘油組48例患者血壓降至目標值,降壓有效率分彆為100%和80%,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。用藥後兩組患者心率均有增加,但珮爾地平組心率在30min時開始逐漸恢複,用藥後60min後心率與用藥前相比差異無統計學意義,硝痠甘油組用藥後60 min心率尚未恢複至用藥前水平,與用藥前相比差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論珮爾地平輸液泵輸註治療高血壓急癥起效迅速、降壓平穩、療效確切,且對心率的影響較小,為急診科治療高血壓急癥的理想藥物。
목적:비교패이지평여초산감유용수액빙수주치료고혈압급증료효급안전성。방법120례고혈압급증환자수궤분위패이지평조화초산감유조,각60례。량조환자균사용미량빙정맥수주강압약。패이지평조:20mg패이지평희석우생리염수지50ml,기시제량4ml/h。초산감유조:50mg초산감유희석우생리염수지50ml,기시제량3ml/h。관찰병기록량조환자용약전、용약5、10、30、60min후적혈압、심솔,거차조정약액빙입속도。비교량조환자용약후기효시간,용약60min후강압유효솔급심솔변화。결과패이지평교초산감유기효쾌,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。용약60 min후,패이지평조전부환자혈압강지목표치,초산감유조48례환자혈압강지목표치,강압유효솔분별위100%화80%,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。용약후량조환자심솔균유증가,단패이지평조심솔재30min시개시축점회복,용약후60min후심솔여용약전상비차이무통계학의의,초산감유조용약후60 min심솔상미회복지용약전수평,여용약전상비차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론패이지평수액빙수주치료고혈압급증기효신속、강압평은、료효학절,차대심솔적영향교소,위급진과치료고혈압급증적이상약물。
Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of continuous intravenous pumping with nicardipine or nitroglycerin for hypertensive emergencies. Methods 120 patients with hypertensive emergencies admitted to our hospital from January 2010 to December 2011 were enrolled and divided into two groups. Patients in nicardipine group(n=60)received continuous intravenous pumping with nicardipine while those in nitroglycerin group(n=60)received nitroglycerin. Onset time of antihypertensive agents,effective rate 60min after drug administration,change of heart rate were observed and compared between the two groups. Results Onset time of nitroglycerin was slower than that of nicardipine,and there was significant difference between the two groups(P<0.05). 60min after drug administration,blood pressure of 60 patients in nicardipine group and 48 patients in nitroglycerin group returned to target value,the effective rate were 100%and 80%respectively,and there was significant difference between the two groups(P<0.05). Before and 60min after drug administration,there was no significant difference of change of heart rate in nicardipine group(P>0.05),while significant difference in nitroglycerin group (P<0.05). Conclusion Continuous intravenous pumping with nicardipine is effective for hypertensive emergencies with quick onset and no obvious heart rate increasing,which is worthy of further clinical application.