中国医药导刊
中國醫藥導刊
중국의약도간
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GUIDE
2014年
1期
163-164
,共2页
急性心肌梗死%GRACE风险评分%Gensini积分%冠状动脉造影
急性心肌梗死%GRACE風險評分%Gensini積分%冠狀動脈造影
급성심기경사%GRACE풍험평분%Gensini적분%관상동맥조영
Acute myocardial infarction%GRACE risk score%Gensini score%Coronary angiography
目的:探讨急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者GRACE危险评分与冠状动脉病变严重程度两者之间的关系。方法:收集2011年1月至12月住院的AMI患者132例,测定GRACE危险评分,行冠脉造影检查,计算冠脉病变支数及Gensini积分。以GRACE危险评分差异分组,分析不同组别中冠状动脉病变的特点,以及与GRACE危险评分的相关性。结果:GRACE危险评分越高,AMI患者冠状动脉病变的范围及狭窄程度越重,GRACE危险评分与冠脉病严重程度有良好的相关性。结论:GRACE危险评分能够用来评价AMI患者冠脉病变的严重程度。
目的:探討急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者GRACE危險評分與冠狀動脈病變嚴重程度兩者之間的關繫。方法:收集2011年1月至12月住院的AMI患者132例,測定GRACE危險評分,行冠脈造影檢查,計算冠脈病變支數及Gensini積分。以GRACE危險評分差異分組,分析不同組彆中冠狀動脈病變的特點,以及與GRACE危險評分的相關性。結果:GRACE危險評分越高,AMI患者冠狀動脈病變的範圍及狹窄程度越重,GRACE危險評分與冠脈病嚴重程度有良好的相關性。結論:GRACE危險評分能夠用來評價AMI患者冠脈病變的嚴重程度。
목적:탐토급성심기경사(AMI)환자GRACE위험평분여관상동맥병변엄중정도량자지간적관계。방법:수집2011년1월지12월주원적AMI환자132례,측정GRACE위험평분,행관맥조영검사,계산관맥병변지수급Gensini적분。이GRACE위험평분차이분조,분석불동조별중관상동맥병변적특점,이급여GRACE위험평분적상관성。결과:GRACE위험평분월고,AMI환자관상동맥병변적범위급협착정도월중,GRACE위험평분여관맥병엄중정도유량호적상관성。결론:GRACE위험평분능구용래평개AMI환자관맥병변적엄중정도。
Objective:To evaluate the relationship of GRACE risk score and severity of the coronary lesions in patients with acute myocardial infarction(AMI).Methods:132 patients with AMI were enrolled from January to December 2011.All of the patients received GRACE score and Coronary angiography. They were divided into different groups according to CRACE risk score. Then the differences of the severity and numbers of pathological arteries among groups were compared.Results:In AMI patients,the results showed that as the results of GRACE risk score increase,the scope and degree of coronary stenosis took on an increasing tendency,GRACE risk score significantly correlated with the severity of coronary lesions. Conclusion:GRACE risk score can be used to evaluate the stenosis level of coronary artery.