宝石和宝石学杂志
寶石和寶石學雜誌
보석화보석학잡지
Journal of Gems & gemmology
2012年
2期
40-43
,共4页
梁宝玉%于万里%曹圆圆%罗永安%董环%王家胜
樑寶玉%于萬裏%曹圓圓%囉永安%董環%王傢勝
량보옥%우만리%조원원%라영안%동배%왕가성
仿寿山石%石膏%烧石膏%X射线粉末衍射%红外光谱
倣壽山石%石膏%燒石膏%X射線粉末衍射%紅外光譜
방수산석%석고%소석고%X사선분말연사%홍외광보
imitated larderite%gypsum%calcined gypsum%XRD%IR
近期,燕山大学珠宝玉石鉴定研究中心收到了一些标称是“寿山石”的样品。采用常规的宝石学检测,测定了样品的折射率、密度、硬度等参数。结果表明,这种样品的折射率约为1.53,相对密度为2.31,摩氏硬度为2.5.虽然样品的颜色、硬度、折射率等与寿山石的都很接近,但是样品的密度低于寿山石的。为了确定其真伪,采用傅里叶变换红外光谱法和X射线粉末衍射法分别对样品进行了分析测试。测试结果表明,该样品主要由石膏和含水量不确定的烧石膏组成,并不含有地开石、珍珠陶石、叶蜡石、伊利石等组成寿山石的矿物相,是一种寿山石的仿制品。这种仿制品在外观上与寿山石很相似,常规宝石学参数也相似,但是前者的密度低于寿山石的。因此,建议检验机构在寿山石的常规检测中应该测定其密度,如果发现密度偏低,应采用其它手段进一步测试。
近期,燕山大學珠寶玉石鑒定研究中心收到瞭一些標稱是“壽山石”的樣品。採用常規的寶石學檢測,測定瞭樣品的摺射率、密度、硬度等參數。結果錶明,這種樣品的摺射率約為1.53,相對密度為2.31,摩氏硬度為2.5.雖然樣品的顏色、硬度、摺射率等與壽山石的都很接近,但是樣品的密度低于壽山石的。為瞭確定其真偽,採用傅裏葉變換紅外光譜法和X射線粉末衍射法分彆對樣品進行瞭分析測試。測試結果錶明,該樣品主要由石膏和含水量不確定的燒石膏組成,併不含有地開石、珍珠陶石、葉蠟石、伊利石等組成壽山石的礦物相,是一種壽山石的倣製品。這種倣製品在外觀上與壽山石很相似,常規寶石學參數也相似,但是前者的密度低于壽山石的。因此,建議檢驗機構在壽山石的常規檢測中應該測定其密度,如果髮現密度偏低,應採用其它手段進一步測試。
근기,연산대학주보옥석감정연구중심수도료일사표칭시“수산석”적양품。채용상규적보석학검측,측정료양품적절사솔、밀도、경도등삼수。결과표명,저충양품적절사솔약위1.53,상대밀도위2.31,마씨경도위2.5.수연양품적안색、경도、절사솔등여수산석적도흔접근,단시양품적밀도저우수산석적。위료학정기진위,채용부리협변환홍외광보법화X사선분말연사법분별대양품진행료분석측시。측시결과표명,해양품주요유석고화함수량불학정적소석고조성,병불함유지개석、진주도석、협사석、이리석등조성수산석적광물상,시일충수산석적방제품。저충방제품재외관상여수산석흔상사,상규보석학삼수야상사,단시전자적밀도저우수산석적。인차,건의검험궤구재수산석적상규검측중응해측정기밀도,여과발현밀도편저,응채용기타수단진일보측시。
Some samples claimed as larderite were received at Yanshan University Gemstone Identification and Research Center recently. The refractive index, density and hardness of the samples were studied by using the conventional gemmological methods. The results show that the refractive index was 1. 53, the density was 2. 31 and the hardness was 2. 5. Although the samples were very similar to larderite in many aspects, such as in colour, refractive index, hardness and so on, its density was slightly lower. X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Fourier transform infrared spectrum (FTIR) were also used to identify the samples in order to decide whether they were larderite or not. The results of XRD and FTIR show that the samples were a kind of imitation since they were composed of gypsum and calcined gypsum with uncertain water content, and that the minerals such as dickite, nacrite, pyrophyllite and illite were not found in the samples. The imitation was very similar to larderite both in appearance and in parameters except that the density of the imitation was a little lower. The density of larderite should be tested in the routine check at the inspection stations. If the density of the stone is lower than the ordinary level, other methods should be used to make further identification.