湖北经济学院学报
湖北經濟學院學報
호북경제학원학보
JOURNAL OF HUBER UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS
2012年
4期
66-70
,共5页
城市圈%政策网络%公私伙伴关系%治理模式
城市圈%政策網絡%公私夥伴關繫%治理模式
성시권%정책망락%공사화반관계%치리모식
metropolis%policy network%public-private partnership%governance model
武汉城市圈的发展既是提升区域竞争力的需要,也是中部崛起的中坚力量。但是,城市圈内各地方政府机构分属不同的行政区划,形成了版图利益的冲突。这种利益冲突通过更高一级的政府来协调,行政成本巨大,而且改变不了根本的利益诉求。此外,城市圈公共事务的复杂性和社会自组织机制的发展要求一种自下而上的权力分配格局。面对这种难题,经过国外大量实践证实的政策网络治理理论为问题的解决提供了思路。本文在对政策网络治理文献梳理的基础上,针对区域规划、公共产品供给、私人产品供给和民生等不同的政策领域,提出了政府机关为中心、政府引导下的私人企业与非营利组织参与、第三方和私人企业为主政府为辅和全部主体参与四种治理模式。
武漢城市圈的髮展既是提升區域競爭力的需要,也是中部崛起的中堅力量。但是,城市圈內各地方政府機構分屬不同的行政區劃,形成瞭版圖利益的遲突。這種利益遲突通過更高一級的政府來協調,行政成本巨大,而且改變不瞭根本的利益訴求。此外,城市圈公共事務的複雜性和社會自組織機製的髮展要求一種自下而上的權力分配格跼。麵對這種難題,經過國外大量實踐證實的政策網絡治理理論為問題的解決提供瞭思路。本文在對政策網絡治理文獻梳理的基礎上,針對區域規劃、公共產品供給、私人產品供給和民生等不同的政策領域,提齣瞭政府機關為中心、政府引導下的私人企業與非營利組織參與、第三方和私人企業為主政府為輔和全部主體參與四種治理模式。
무한성시권적발전기시제승구역경쟁력적수요,야시중부굴기적중견역량。단시,성시권내각지방정부궤구분속불동적행정구화,형성료판도이익적충돌。저충이익충돌통과경고일급적정부래협조,행정성본거대,이차개변불료근본적이익소구。차외,성시권공공사무적복잡성화사회자조직궤제적발전요구일충자하이상적권력분배격국。면대저충난제,경과국외대량실천증실적정책망락치리이론위문제적해결제공료사로。본문재대정책망락치리문헌소리적기출상,침대구역규화、공공산품공급、사인산품공급화민생등불동적정책영역,제출료정부궤관위중심、정부인도하적사인기업여비영리조직삼여、제삼방화사인기업위주정부위보화전부주체삼여사충치리모식。
The purpose of developing Wuhan metropolis is to enhance regional competitiveness in mid-China as part of plan for rise of central China. Local governments between this metropolitan area who are much fragmented, however, have respective jurisdiction interest which result in goal conflict and coordination dilemma. The method to coordinate such interests＇ conflicts through higher-level government should increase the administrative costs, and can not change the fundamental interest demands. In addition, the complexity of public affairs in metropolis and development of the social self-organization mechanism require a bottom-up distributing of power. Network governance proved an efficient solution to these problems by practice of west countries can be used to explore how to handle the cooperation issue in this paper. After main literature review in net-work governance area, four governance models targeting at Wuhan metropolis are designed： （1）as to regional plan policy, it should be government-centered and participants should be less; （2）as for policies involved in public goods, private firms and non-profit organizations should take part in decision-making and be guided by governments; （3）policies about production of private commodities should mainly decided by private and nor-profit organizations, government steering; （4）policies decision- making about the peoples＇ livelihood should follow citizens＇ will and be taken bottom-up decision model.
