CAJ | 학술논문

由于参与法律活动的人的角色不同,因而其法律推理的目的、采用的方法也不尽相同。作为私权捍卫者的律师应当竭力为委托人的利益服务,作为制度权威言说者的法官有责任作出正当的裁判,承担教学和学术角色的法学教授则应成为法律智慧的启发者和学术知识的增量扩充者。不同角色主体的参与、争辩、对话,是聚向善治的生命活水和智慧溪流。
유우삼여법률활동적인적각색불동,인이기법률추리적목적、채용적방법야불진상동。작위사권한위자적률사응당갈력위위탁인적이익복무,작위제도권위언설자적법관유책임작출정당적재판,승담교학화학술각색적법학교수칙응성위법률지혜적계발자화학술지식적증량확충자。불동각색주체적삼여、쟁변、대화,시취향선치적생명활수화지혜계류。
Different role in legal matters affects main objectives and methods in legal reasoning.Lawyer as defender of private rights ought to do their utmost to help his client,The judge as spokesman of institutional authority have responsibility in legitimate judgment,Legal professor as taking teach and engaging in studies should enlight wisdom.Conversation in different subject lead to good governance.