中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2012年
32期
3939-3942
,共4页
曾定芬%刘真君%李晓霞%范玉霞%江华
曾定芬%劉真君%李曉霞%範玉霞%江華
증정분%류진군%리효하%범옥하%강화
机械辅助%排痰%人工气道%肺部感染
機械輔助%排痰%人工氣道%肺部感染
궤계보조%배담%인공기도%폐부감염
Mechanic auxiliary%Expectoration%Artificial airway%Lung infection
目的 探讨机械辅助排痰在预防建立人工气道的患者肺部感染的应用效果.方法 将116例建立人工气道的患者,根据患者入住ICU的时间顺序编号,按单双号将入选患者分为对照组和观察组,每组58例.对照组患者使用常规治疗,观察组患者在接受常规治疗的同时选用G2000振动排痰机-Hema进行胸部叩击振动排痰.观察两组患者排痰效果、肺部感染、患者的舒适度及护理人员的操作感受等.结果 观察组发生肺部感染5例,对照组为14例;观察组患者排痰量为(38.6±4.1)ml/d,排痰有效18例,显效32例;对照组患者排痰量为(33.8±3.3) ml/d,排痰有效12例,显效26例,两组患者在肺部感染发生例数、排痰量、排痰效果方面比较,差异有统计学意义(t/x2值分别为5.098,2.021,-2.334;P<0.05).观察组护理人员在操作的方便程度,省力与否及患者的舒适度方面比较均优于对照组,两组比较,差异均有统计学意义(x2/Z值分别为-5.097,11.226,-3.250;P <0.01).结论 机械辅助排痰可提高人工气道患者的排痰效果,有效降低肺部感率,增加患者的舒适度,同时减轻护理工作量,建议在临床推广应用.
目的 探討機械輔助排痰在預防建立人工氣道的患者肺部感染的應用效果.方法 將116例建立人工氣道的患者,根據患者入住ICU的時間順序編號,按單雙號將入選患者分為對照組和觀察組,每組58例.對照組患者使用常規治療,觀察組患者在接受常規治療的同時選用G2000振動排痰機-Hema進行胸部叩擊振動排痰.觀察兩組患者排痰效果、肺部感染、患者的舒適度及護理人員的操作感受等.結果 觀察組髮生肺部感染5例,對照組為14例;觀察組患者排痰量為(38.6±4.1)ml/d,排痰有效18例,顯效32例;對照組患者排痰量為(33.8±3.3) ml/d,排痰有效12例,顯效26例,兩組患者在肺部感染髮生例數、排痰量、排痰效果方麵比較,差異有統計學意義(t/x2值分彆為5.098,2.021,-2.334;P<0.05).觀察組護理人員在操作的方便程度,省力與否及患者的舒適度方麵比較均優于對照組,兩組比較,差異均有統計學意義(x2/Z值分彆為-5.097,11.226,-3.250;P <0.01).結論 機械輔助排痰可提高人工氣道患者的排痰效果,有效降低肺部感率,增加患者的舒適度,同時減輕護理工作量,建議在臨床推廣應用.
목적 탐토궤계보조배담재예방건립인공기도적환자폐부감염적응용효과.방법 장116례건립인공기도적환자,근거환자입주ICU적시간순서편호,안단쌍호장입선환자분위대조조화관찰조,매조58례.대조조환자사용상규치료,관찰조환자재접수상규치료적동시선용G2000진동배담궤-Hema진행흉부고격진동배담.관찰량조환자배담효과、폐부감염、환자적서괄도급호리인원적조작감수등.결과 관찰조발생폐부감염5례,대조조위14례;관찰조환자배담량위(38.6±4.1)ml/d,배담유효18례,현효32례;대조조환자배담량위(33.8±3.3) ml/d,배담유효12례,현효26례,량조환자재폐부감염발생례수、배담량、배담효과방면비교,차이유통계학의의(t/x2치분별위5.098,2.021,-2.334;P<0.05).관찰조호리인원재조작적방편정도,성력여부급환자적서괄도방면비교균우우대조조,량조비교,차이균유통계학의의(x2/Z치분별위-5.097,11.226,-3.250;P <0.01).결론 궤계보조배담가제고인공기도환자적배담효과,유효강저폐부감솔,증가환자적서괄도,동시감경호리공작량,건의재림상추엄응용.
Objective To research the effects of mechanic auxiliary expectoration on prevention of pneumonia of patients with artificial airway.Methods According to the admission number,116 patients with establishment of artificial airway were divided into treatment group and control group,and 58 cases in each group.Hama mechanic assisted expectoration was used in the treatment group,while traditional chest percussion in the control group.Then,expectoration effect,pulmonary infection,comfort of patients and operation feeling of nursing staff were observed and statistical analyzed.Results The incidence of pneumonia (5 vs 14),sputum volume [(38.6 ± 4.1 ml/d vs 33.8 ± 3.3 ml/d)],expectoration effective cases (18 vs 12),expectoration markedly effective cases (32 vs 26) between treatment group and control group were significantly significant (t/x2 =5.098,2.021,-2.334,respectively; P <0.05).Significant difference were found in the comfort of the patients and operating experience of nursing staff (x2/Z =-5.097,11.226,-3.250,respectively; P < 0.01).Conclusions Mechanic auxiliary expectoration can improve sputum drainage of patients with artificial airway,reduce the rates of lung infection and nursing workload,improve patient comfort.It' s worth popularizing in the clinical application.