中华行为医学与脑科学杂志
中華行為醫學與腦科學雜誌
중화행위의학여뇌과학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE AND BRAIN SCIENCE
2014年
1期
80-82
,共3页
李宁宁%王旭梅%姜潮%徐庆怡%苏荣坤%郑超%姜楠%隋雨彤%姜华
李寧寧%王旭梅%薑潮%徐慶怡%囌榮坤%鄭超%薑楠%隋雨彤%薑華
리저저%왕욱매%강조%서경이%소영곤%정초%강남%수우동%강화
防御方式问卷%信度%效度
防禦方式問捲%信度%效度
방어방식문권%신도%효도
Defense style questionnaire%Reliability%Validity
目的 重新翻译防御方式问卷(The Defense Style Questionnaire,DSQ),并分析其信效度.方法 采用方便取样的原则选取社区居民437人,门诊患者166人进行DSQ和艾森克人格问卷的测量.初测3个月后,从社区居民中随机选取128人重测.结果 (1)项目CR值为8.27~51.81(P<0.01).(2)DSQ四个因子的Cronbach's α系数为0.609~ 0.875,重测信度为0.72~0.81.(3)验证性因素,修正模型X2/df=3.05,GFI=0.90,AGFI=0.87,CFI=0.86,RMSEA=0.06.结论 该中文版本DSQ具有较好的信效度,与理论模型有一定的拟合程度.
目的 重新翻譯防禦方式問捲(The Defense Style Questionnaire,DSQ),併分析其信效度.方法 採用方便取樣的原則選取社區居民437人,門診患者166人進行DSQ和艾森剋人格問捲的測量.初測3箇月後,從社區居民中隨機選取128人重測.結果 (1)項目CR值為8.27~51.81(P<0.01).(2)DSQ四箇因子的Cronbach's α繫數為0.609~ 0.875,重測信度為0.72~0.81.(3)驗證性因素,脩正模型X2/df=3.05,GFI=0.90,AGFI=0.87,CFI=0.86,RMSEA=0.06.結論 該中文版本DSQ具有較好的信效度,與理論模型有一定的擬閤程度.
목적 중신번역방어방식문권(The Defense Style Questionnaire,DSQ),병분석기신효도.방법 채용방편취양적원칙선취사구거민437인,문진환자166인진행DSQ화애삼극인격문권적측량.초측3개월후,종사구거민중수궤선취128인중측.결과 (1)항목CR치위8.27~51.81(P<0.01).(2)DSQ사개인자적Cronbach's α계수위0.609~ 0.875,중측신도위0.72~0.81.(3)험증성인소,수정모형X2/df=3.05,GFI=0.90,AGFI=0.87,CFI=0.86,RMSEA=0.06.결론 해중문판본DSQ구유교호적신효도,여이론모형유일정적의합정도.
Objective To retranslate and examine the reliability and validity of the defense style questionnaire(DSQ).Methods By convenience sampling 437community residents and 166 outpatients were assessed by the DSQ and Eysenck personality questionnaire(EPQ).128 among the community residents were retested with the DSQ after 3 months.Results (1)Each items of the CR values were 8.27-51.81(P<0.01).(2)Cronbach' α of DSQ's four factors were 0.609-0.875,and test-retest reliability was 0.72-0.81.(3)Confirmatory factor analysis showed x2/df =3.05,GFI =0.90,AGFI =0.87,CFI =0.86,RMSEA =0.06.Conclusion DSQ by restranslating shows good reliability and validity,and the construction of the scale fit the original construction.