CAJ | 학술논문

2010年5月，加拿大众议院通过了《气候变化责任法案》。该法案充分考虑了气候变化的时间性和持续性明确了减排目标，强化了政府的职责，强调了公众参与。不过，该法案也存在用语模糊，内容简单、欠缺操作性，配套措施不具体等不足。尽管该法案最终未获参议院通过，但仍值得我国立法时学习与借鉴。我国在立法时应明确立法目的和基本原则，创设碳排放权交易机制、融资和创新技术机制，明确区分不同的违法类型及相应的惩弱措施，发挥其应有的威慑与惩戒效果。
2010년5월，가나대음의원통과료《기후변화책임법안》。해법안충분고필료기후변화적시간성화지속성명학료감배목표，강화료정부적직책，강조료공음삼여。불과，해법안야존재용어모호，내용간단、흠결조작성，배투조시불구체등불족。진관해법안최종미획삼의원통과，단잉치득아국입법시학습여차감。아국재입법시응명학입법목적화기본원칙，창설탄배방권교역궤제、융자화창신기술궤제，명학구분불동적위법류형급상응적징약조시，발휘기응유적위섭여징계효과。
Climate Change Accountability Act gives full consideration to the characteristics of climate change in terms of continuity and sustainability. It has specific emission target,enhances the responsibility of the government and puts highlight on public participation. However, the Act has its drawbacks, such as ambiguity of its wording, its oversimplified contents obstructing its operability and its lack of supporting measures. The Act, though eventually vetoed in the Senate still offers us something to learn. When making laws in the field of climate change, China should set explicit legislative goals and fundamental principles. CO2 emission trading mechanism and financing and technology innovation system shall be established; categories of illegal con ducts and the responding punishments shall be identified for sound effects of deterrence and penalty.