河北农业科学
河北農業科學
하북농업과학
JOURNAL OF HEBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES
2012年
3期
11-14
,共4页
相金英%程汝宏%张喜瑞%师志刚
相金英%程汝宏%張喜瑞%師誌剛
상금영%정여굉%장희서%사지강
硅肥%谷子%产量%根鲜重%根条数
硅肥%穀子%產量%根鮮重%根條數
규비%곡자%산량%근선중%근조수
Silicon fertilizer%Foxtail millet%Yield%Root fresh weight%Root number
以抗倒性不同的3个谷子品种冀谷31(高抗)、冀谷20(中抗)和张杂谷8号(不抗)为试材,均设土壤施用硅肥0(CK)、300、450、600和750 kg/hm2计5个处理,研究了施用硅肥对拔节期和抽穗期夏谷根系生长(单株根鲜重、单株根条数)以及对谷子产量的影响。结果表明:试验硅肥施用量范围内,施用硅肥对3个谷子品种拔节期、抽穗期的单株根鲜重和单株根条数,以及产量均无显著影响;不同谷子品种对拔节期和抽穗期的单株根鲜重及单株根条数均有极显著影响,对产量影响不显著。在拔节期,3个谷子品种的单株根鲜重顺序为张杂谷8号〉冀谷31〉冀谷20,其中,张杂谷8号和冀谷31与冀谷20间的差异均达到了极显著水平;单株根条数顺序为冀谷31〉张杂谷8号〉冀谷20,其中,冀谷31和张杂谷8号与冀谷20间的差异均达到了极显著水平。在抽穗期,3个谷子品种的单株根鲜重顺序为冀谷31〉张杂谷8号〉冀谷20,其中,冀谷31与张杂谷8号和冀谷20间的差异均达到了极显著水平;单株根条数顺序为冀谷31〉张杂谷8号〉冀谷20,其中,张杂谷8号与冀谷31和冀谷20间的差异均达到了显著水平,冀谷31与冀谷20间的差异达到了极显著水平。且试验施硅量范围内,抽穗期的单株根鲜重和单株根条数均多于拔节期。
以抗倒性不同的3箇穀子品種冀穀31(高抗)、冀穀20(中抗)和張雜穀8號(不抗)為試材,均設土壤施用硅肥0(CK)、300、450、600和750 kg/hm2計5箇處理,研究瞭施用硅肥對拔節期和抽穗期夏穀根繫生長(單株根鮮重、單株根條數)以及對穀子產量的影響。結果錶明:試驗硅肥施用量範圍內,施用硅肥對3箇穀子品種拔節期、抽穗期的單株根鮮重和單株根條數,以及產量均無顯著影響;不同穀子品種對拔節期和抽穗期的單株根鮮重及單株根條數均有極顯著影響,對產量影響不顯著。在拔節期,3箇穀子品種的單株根鮮重順序為張雜穀8號〉冀穀31〉冀穀20,其中,張雜穀8號和冀穀31與冀穀20間的差異均達到瞭極顯著水平;單株根條數順序為冀穀31〉張雜穀8號〉冀穀20,其中,冀穀31和張雜穀8號與冀穀20間的差異均達到瞭極顯著水平。在抽穗期,3箇穀子品種的單株根鮮重順序為冀穀31〉張雜穀8號〉冀穀20,其中,冀穀31與張雜穀8號和冀穀20間的差異均達到瞭極顯著水平;單株根條數順序為冀穀31〉張雜穀8號〉冀穀20,其中,張雜穀8號與冀穀31和冀穀20間的差異均達到瞭顯著水平,冀穀31與冀穀20間的差異達到瞭極顯著水平。且試驗施硅量範圍內,抽穗期的單株根鮮重和單株根條數均多于拔節期。
이항도성불동적3개곡자품충기곡31(고항)、기곡20(중항)화장잡곡8호(불항)위시재,균설토양시용규비0(CK)、300、450、600화750 kg/hm2계5개처리,연구료시용규비대발절기화추수기하곡근계생장(단주근선중、단주근조수)이급대곡자산량적영향。결과표명:시험규비시용량범위내,시용규비대3개곡자품충발절기、추수기적단주근선중화단주근조수,이급산량균무현저영향;불동곡자품충대발절기화추수기적단주근선중급단주근조수균유겁현저영향,대산량영향불현저。재발절기,3개곡자품충적단주근선중순서위장잡곡8호〉기곡31〉기곡20,기중,장잡곡8호화기곡31여기곡20간적차이균체도료겁현저수평;단주근조수순서위기곡31〉장잡곡8호〉기곡20,기중,기곡31화장잡곡8호여기곡20간적차이균체도료겁현저수평。재추수기,3개곡자품충적단주근선중순서위기곡31〉장잡곡8호〉기곡20,기중,기곡31여장잡곡8호화기곡20간적차이균체도료겁현저수평;단주근조수순서위기곡31〉장잡곡8호〉기곡20,기중,장잡곡8호여기곡31화기곡20간적차이균체도료현저수평,기곡31여기곡20간적차이체도료겁현저수평。차시험시규량범위내,추수기적단주근선중화단주근조수균다우발절기。
Using foxtail millet varieties Jigu 31 (high resistance lodging) and Zhangzagu No. 8 (non-resistance to lodging) as the to lodging), Jigu 20 (moderate resistance to materials, the effects of concentration of silicon varieties. At jointing stage, the root fresh weight of Zhangagu No. 8 was very significantly higher than that of Jigu 31 and Jigu 20. The root number of Jigu 31 was very significantly higher than that of Zhangzagu No. 8 and Jigu 20. At heading stage, the root fresh weight of Jigu 31 was very significantly higher than that of Zhangagu No. 8 and Jigu 20. The order of root number was Jigu 31 〉 Zhangagu No. 8 〉 Jigu 20, there were significant differences between Jigu 20. Zhangagu No. 8 and Jigu 31 and Jigu 20, and there was very significant difference between Jigu 31 and The root fresh weight and root number at heading stage were higher than those at jointing stage