浙江工商大学学报
浙江工商大學學報
절강공상대학학보
JOURNAL OF HANGZHOU UNIVERSITY OF COMMERCE
2012年
4期
71-77
,共7页
对口援助%抉择分析%地震%重建
對口援助%抉擇分析%地震%重建
대구원조%결택분석%지진%중건
counterpart assistance%choice analysis%disasters%reconstruction
本文就Popple＆Leighninger’s（2011）“抉择分析”（ChoiceAnalysis），针对中国汶川救灾重建《对口支援》政策进行四个层面的分析：（一）筛选基础；（二）资金开源；（三）政策推行；（四）受益类型。进而，带出中国垂直的政策制定结构的特点，供国外治理灾害参考、对比。
本文就Popple＆Leighninger’s（2011）“抉擇分析”（ChoiceAnalysis），針對中國汶川救災重建《對口支援》政策進行四箇層麵的分析：（一）篩選基礎；（二）資金開源；（三）政策推行；（四）受益類型。進而，帶齣中國垂直的政策製定結構的特點，供國外治理災害參攷、對比。
본문취Popple＆Leighninger’s（2011）“결택분석”（ChoiceAnalysis），침대중국문천구재중건《대구지원》정책진행사개층면적분석：（일）사선기출；（이）자금개원；（삼）정책추행；（사）수익류형。진이，대출중국수직적정책제정결구적특점，공국외치리재해삼고、대비。
The aim of this paper is to contribute to knowledge on the post-disaster restoration in China, within the context of a twinned provinces assistance policy. Using Popple ＆ Leighninger＇s （2011） ＂choice analysis＂, this paper examines four dimensions of China＇s counterpart assistance policy decisions ： bases of allocations; financing benefits; delivery structure; and types of benefits. Furthermore, much scholarship on China emphasizes its vertical policy-making structure and does not pay as much attention to its horizontal approach of policy administration. China＇s counterpart assistance policy serves to illustrate the horizontal nature of partnerships in China.
