江苏林业科技
江囌林業科技
강소임업과기
JOURNAL OF JIANGSU FORESTRY SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
2012年
4期
22-27
,共6页
何蓉%周恒元%彭波%唐中海
何蓉%週恆元%彭波%唐中海
하용%주항원%팽파%당중해
人为干扰%迁徙水鸟%停歇%最小接近距离
人為榦擾%遷徙水鳥%停歇%最小接近距離
인위간우%천사수조%정헐%최소접근거리
Human disturbance%Migratory Water fowl%Behavior%Minimal approach distance
采用野外直接观察法和最小接近距离试验法对绵阳三江(涪江、安昌江和芙蓉溪)的迁徙水鸟的迁徙及人为干扰对水鸟停歇的影响进行了研究。结果表明,98%的水鸟在55 m或更小的距离上通过游走或惊飞对人类的活动做出反应。干扰类型为1人行走,2人行走,3人行走;1人奔跑,2人奔跑,3人奔跑对水鸟移动的距离、移动的次数以及水鸟对人类靠近的反应均具有一定的影响。人为干扰最小接近距离试验结果表明,水鸟的反应距离是30~60 m。干扰人数为1人时的最小接近距离小于2人和3人,2人小于3人,干扰类型为行走时最小接近距离小于奔跑。记录不同停歇地水鸟的觅食、规避时间,结果为在人为干扰下,水鸟的觅食时间显著减少。
採用野外直接觀察法和最小接近距離試驗法對綿暘三江(涪江、安昌江和芙蓉溪)的遷徙水鳥的遷徙及人為榦擾對水鳥停歇的影響進行瞭研究。結果錶明,98%的水鳥在55 m或更小的距離上通過遊走或驚飛對人類的活動做齣反應。榦擾類型為1人行走,2人行走,3人行走;1人奔跑,2人奔跑,3人奔跑對水鳥移動的距離、移動的次數以及水鳥對人類靠近的反應均具有一定的影響。人為榦擾最小接近距離試驗結果錶明,水鳥的反應距離是30~60 m。榦擾人數為1人時的最小接近距離小于2人和3人,2人小于3人,榦擾類型為行走時最小接近距離小于奔跑。記錄不同停歇地水鳥的覓食、規避時間,結果為在人為榦擾下,水鳥的覓食時間顯著減少。
채용야외직접관찰법화최소접근거리시험법대면양삼강(부강、안창강화부용계)적천사수조적천사급인위간우대수조정헐적영향진행료연구。결과표명,98%적수조재55 m혹경소적거리상통과유주혹량비대인류적활동주출반응。간우류형위1인행주,2인행주,3인행주;1인분포,2인분포,3인분포대수조이동적거리、이동적차수이급수조대인류고근적반응균구유일정적영향。인위간우최소접근거리시험결과표명,수조적반응거리시30~60 m。간우인수위1인시적최소접근거리소우2인화3인,2인소우3인,간우류형위행주시최소접근거리소우분포。기록불동정헐지수조적멱식、규피시간,결과위재인위간우하,수조적멱식시간현저감소。
Studies on effects of human activity on the migratory behavior of the water fowl were conducted using methods of direct wild observation and human disturbance experiment in the Three rivers of Mianyang ( Fu Rive, Anchang River and Furong Stream) from October 2005 to April 2007. Results show that 98% of water birds responded to human disturbances at the distance of 35 m or less by either running or flying. The types of human disturbance were designed as walking or run- ning alone, by two people or three people. Number of persons and type of human activities had significant effects on their distance from the four, duration of migratory behavior, and on person' s nearness respectively. Results of human disturbance experiment indicated that the distances of water fowl responding to human were 30 - 60 m. The minimal approach distance to one person was smaller than that to two or three, the distance on two was also smaller than on three ones. The minimal approach distance to walking was smaller than to running. Results of foraging and evading time show that the time of for a- ging was significantly shorter by human-disturbance.