重庆交通大学学报：社会科学版
重慶交通大學學報：社會科學版
중경교통대학학보：사회과학판
Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Social Sciences Edition)
2012年
4期
30-33
,共4页
反垄断法执法和解%经营者承诺%行政契约%行政和解
反壟斷法執法和解%經營者承諾%行政契約%行政和解
반롱단법집법화해%경영자승낙%행정계약%행정화해
reconciliation of execution in anti-monopoly law%undertaking commitment%administrative contract%administrative reconciliation
我国《反垄断法》第45条规定的经营者承诺制度的实质是行政和解。鉴于目前经营者承诺制度立法及理论的不成熟，有必要借鉴行政契约理念及行政和解理论展开对反垄断执法承诺制度的重新诠释，使反垄断和解制度获得理念和原理的支撑，并回应反垄断执法和解制度的正当性危机，弥补执法程序规则阙失之不足，规范反垄断执法中公权力的行使，从而厘清其制度逻辑，彰显其制度禀赋，重塑其制度价值。
我國《反壟斷法》第45條規定的經營者承諾製度的實質是行政和解。鑒于目前經營者承諾製度立法及理論的不成熟，有必要藉鑒行政契約理唸及行政和解理論展開對反壟斷執法承諾製度的重新詮釋，使反壟斷和解製度穫得理唸和原理的支撐，併迴應反壟斷執法和解製度的正噹性危機，瀰補執法程序規則闕失之不足，規範反壟斷執法中公權力的行使，從而釐清其製度邏輯，彰顯其製度稟賦，重塑其製度價值。
아국《반롱단법》제45조규정적경영자승낙제도적실질시행정화해。감우목전경영자승낙제도입법급이론적불성숙，유필요차감행정계약이념급행정화해이론전개대반롱단집법승낙제도적중신전석，사반롱단화해제도획득이념화원리적지탱，병회응반롱단집법화해제도적정당성위궤，미보집법정서규칙궐실지불족，규범반롱단집법중공권력적행사，종이전청기제도라집，창현기제도품부，중소기제도개치。
According to article 45 of Anti-monopoly Law of People＇s Republic of China, the ＂undertaking commitment＂ is a dispute resolution mechanism which legally binds the undertaking concerned to the commitment it has offered. As this mechanism may end the Bureau＇s investigation, it is essentially a certain kind of administrative reconciliation. Since ＂undertaking commitment＂ still has deficiencies in both legislation practice and theory construction in China, it is necessary to look back for the basic theory of administrative contract and administrative reconciliation. These basic principles and ideas can provide support for anti-monopoly reconciliation mechanism, challenge the doubts of legitimacy, make up for the deficiency in procedure and regulate the execution of public power in order to help us clarify its logic, find out its advantages and rebuild its value.
